BACKGROUND: The role of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in the development of atherosclerosis is still open to debate. In the Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events (ILLUMINATE) trial, inhibition of CETP in patients with high cardiovascular risk was associated with increased high-density lipoprotein levels but increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this report, we present a prospective observational study of patients referred to coronary angiography in which CETP was examined in relation to morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: CETP concentration was determined in 3256 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study who were referred to coronary angiography at baseline between 1997 and 2000. Median follow-up time was 7.75 years. Primary and secondary end points were cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, respectively. CETP levels were higher in women and lower in smokers, in diabetic patients, and in patients with unstable coronary artery disease, respectively. In addition, CETP levels were correlated negatively with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6. After adjustment for age, sex, medication, coronary artery disease status, cardiovascular risk factors, and diabetes mellitus, the hazard ratio for death in the lowest CETP quartile was 1.33 (1.07 to 1.65; P=0.011) compared with patients in the highest CETP quartile. Corresponding hazard ratios for death in the second and third CETP quartiles were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.48; P=0.19) and 1.10 (0.86 to 1.39; P=0.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We interpret our data to suggest that low endogenous CETP plasma levels per se are associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, challenging the rationale of pharmacological CETP inhibition.
BACKGROUND: The role of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in the development of atherosclerosis is still open to debate. In the Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events (ILLUMINATE) trial, inhibition of CETP in patients with high cardiovascular risk was associated with increased high-density lipoprotein levels but increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this report, we present a prospective observational study of patients referred to coronary angiography in which CETP was examined in relation to morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS:CETP concentration was determined in 3256 participants of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study who were referred to coronary angiography at baseline between 1997 and 2000. Median follow-up time was 7.75 years. Primary and secondary end points were cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, respectively. CETP levels were higher in women and lower in smokers, in diabeticpatients, and in patients with unstable coronary artery disease, respectively. In addition, CETP levels were correlated negatively with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6. After adjustment for age, sex, medication, coronary artery disease status, cardiovascular risk factors, and diabetes mellitus, the hazard ratio for death in the lowest CETP quartile was 1.33 (1.07 to 1.65; P=0.011) compared with patients in the highest CETP quartile. Corresponding hazard ratios for death in the second and third CETP quartiles were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.48; P=0.19) and 1.10 (0.86 to 1.39; P=0.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We interpret our data to suggest that low endogenous CETP plasma levels per se are associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, challenging the rationale of pharmacological CETP inhibition.
Authors: Andreas Ritsch; Christoph Ebenbichler; Elisabeth Naschberger; Wilfried Schgoer; Ursula Stanzl; Hermann Dietrich; Peter C Heinrich; Kazunori Saito; Josef R Patsch Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Sebhat Erqou; Danish Saleheen; Robin P F Dullaart; Bernard Keavney; Zheng Ye; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Margaret E Brousseau; Ernst J Schaefer; Megan L Wolfe; LeAnne T Bloedon; Andres G Digenio; Ronald W Clark; James P Mancuso; Daniel J Rader Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrícia M Cazita; Denise F Barbeiro; Ana I S Moretti; Eder C R Quintão; Francisco G Soriano Journal: Shock Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Thomas Gautier; Willeke de Haan; Jacques Grober; Dan Ye; Matthias J Bahr; Thierry Claudel; Niels Nijstad; Theo J C Van Berkel; Louis M Havekes; Michael P Manns; Stefan M Willems; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Laurent Lagrost; Folkert Kuipers; Miranda Van Eck; Patrick C N Rensen; Uwe J F Tietge Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Sander J Robins; Asya Lyass; Robert W Brocia; Joseph M Massaro; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 5.162