Yariv Gerber1, Yael Benyamini, Uri Goldbourt, Yaacov Drory. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel. yarivg@post.tau.ac.il
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood of residence has been suggested to affect cardiovascular risk above and beyond personal socioeconomic status (SES). However, such data are currently lacking for patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We examined all-cause and cardiac mortality according to neighborhood SES in a cohort of MI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients < or =65 years of age discharged from 8 hospitals in central Israel after incident MI in 1992 to 1993 were followed up through 2005. Individual data were obtained at study entry, including education, income, and employment. Neighborhood SES was estimated through a composite census-derived index developed by the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. During follow-up, 326 deaths occurred in 1179 patients. Patients residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods had higher mortality rates, with 13-year survival estimates of 61%, 74%, and 82% in increasing tertiles (P(trend)<0.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, traditional risk factors, MI severity indexes, and individual SES measures, the hazard ratios for death associated with neighborhood SES were 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.06) in the lower and 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.63) in the middle tertiles compared with the upper tertile (P(trend)=0.02). The respective hazard ratios were even stronger for cardiac death (1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.25; and 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 2.07). In the final models, neighborhood context and several individual SES measures were concurrently associated with all-cause and cardiac mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood SES is strongly associated with long-term survival after MI. The association is partly, but not entirely, attributable to individual SES and clinical characteristics. These data support a multidimensional relationship between SES and MI outcome.
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood of residence has been suggested to affect cardiovascular risk above and beyond personal socioeconomic status (SES). However, such data are currently lacking for patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We examined all-cause and cardiac mortality according to neighborhood SES in a cohort of MI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients < or =65 years of age discharged from 8 hospitals in central Israel after incident MI in 1992 to 1993 were followed up through 2005. Individual data were obtained at study entry, including education, income, and employment. Neighborhood SES was estimated through a composite census-derived index developed by the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. During follow-up, 326 deaths occurred in 1179 patients. Patients residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods had higher mortality rates, with 13-year survival estimates of 61%, 74%, and 82% in increasing tertiles (P(trend)<0.001). After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, traditional risk factors, MI severity indexes, and individual SES measures, the hazard ratios for death associated with neighborhood SES were 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.06) in the lower and 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.63) in the middle tertiles compared with the upper tertile (P(trend)=0.02). The respective hazard ratios were even stronger for cardiac death (1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 2.25; and 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 2.07). In the final models, neighborhood context and several individual SES measures were concurrently associated with all-cause and cardiac mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood SES is strongly associated with long-term survival after MI. The association is partly, but not entirely, attributable to individual SES and clinical characteristics. These data support a multidimensional relationship between SES and MI outcome.
Authors: Carina Wennerholm; Björn Grip; Annakarin Johansson; Hans Nilsson; Marja-Liisa Honkasalo; Tomas Faresjö Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Martha E Billings; Dayna A Johnson; Guido Simonelli; Kari Moore; Sanjay R Patel; Ana V Diez Roux; Susan Redline Journal: Chest Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Matthew L Topel; Jeong Hwan Kim; Mahasin S Mujahid; Samaah M Sullivan; Yi-An Ko; Viola Vaccarino; Arshed A Quyyumi; Tené T Lewis Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Yariv Gerber; Vicki Myers; David M Broday; Silvia Koton; David M Steinberg; Yaacov Drory Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mariana Arcaya; M Maria Glymour; Prabal Chakrabarti; Nicholas A Christakis; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 29.690