Literature DB >> 20065074

How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals.

Virginia Barbour.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20065074      PMCID： PMC2805735          DOI： 10.3324/haematol.2009.017426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN： 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  'Ghostbusting' at blood.

Authors:  Cynthia E Dunbar; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Kevin P Hill; David S Egilman; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.

Authors:  A Flanagin; L A Carey; P B Fontanarosa; S G Phillips; B P Pace; G D Lundberg; D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Reporting mortality findings in trials of rofecoxib for Alzheimer disease or cognitive impairment: a case study based on documents from rofecoxib litigation.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Helle Krogh Johansen; Mette T Haahr; Douglas G Altman; An-Wen Chan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Ghostwriting: the dirty little secret of medical publishing that just got bigger.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.069
  6 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Rising from Plagiarising.

Authors:  Muralee Mohan; Deepthi Shetty; Tripthi Shetty; Kalpa Pandya
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-10-21

2.  Exorcising ghostwriting…. Ghostwriting could potentially have serious repercussions for science and should therefore be treated as research misconduct.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.

Authors:  Daniela Cutas; David Shaw
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Scientific authorship and intellectual involvement in the research: should they coincide?

Authors:  Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-05

5.  Transgression in scientific communication.

Authors:  Pf Kotur
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

6.  Challenging medical ghostwriting in US courts.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Bijan Esfandiari; Leemon McHenry
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Authorship issues.

Authors:  Sandeep B Bavdekar
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2012-01

8.  Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications.

Authors:  Ana Marušić; Darko Hren; Bernadette Mansi; Neil Lineberry; Ananya Bhattacharya; Maureen Garrity; Juli Clark; Thomas Gesell; Susan Glasser; John Gonzalez; Carolyn Hustad; Mary-Margaret Lannon; LaVerne A Mooney; Teresa Peña
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals.

Authors:  Wilfred Dang; Matthew D F McInnes; Ania Z Kielar; Jiho Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.