Literature DB >> 20064916

Group differences in outpatient help-seeking for psychological distress: results from a national prospective study of Icelanders.

Gudrun Gudmundsdottir1, Runar Vilhjalmsson.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study focused on group differences in health care use for psychological distress. Specifically, the study examined if some subgroups and kinds of distress predicted use of particular providers.
METHODS: The study uses data from a repeated national postal health survey of a random sample of Icelanders aged 18-75. Response rate at the first wave was 69% (n = 1924), and 83% of the participants from the first wave also responded to the second. The dependent variables referred to use of outpatient visits to different types of professionals (doctor, psychiatrist, registered nurse, psychologist, social worker, clergy, and complementary and alternative medicine provider).
RESULTS: Gender, age, marital status, residence, education and income affected the selection of healthcare provider. Significant interactions indicated, among other things, that divorced people made the most visits to psychiatrists when depressed, that urban residents visited psychiatrists and psychologists more than others when experiencing anxiety, that the university-educated visited psychologists more when depressed, and that individuals with higher incomes visited psychiatrists, nurses and social workers less when experiencing anxiety or depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate considerable group variations in help-seeking. The group in question and the nature of symptoms affected the decision where to seek help. A substantial number of distressed individuals do not seek any professional help, and there are indications of inequity in the distribution of health services. Further studies are needed to better understand the complex social selection processes involved in seeking help for psychological problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064916     DOI: 10.1177/1403494809357357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

1.  Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms.

Authors:  Rachel H Salk; Janet S Hyde; Lyn Y Abramson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  School performance and hospital admission due to unipolar depression: a three-generational study of social causation and social selection.

Authors:  Ulf Jonsson; Anna Goodman; Anne-Liis von Knorring; Lars von Knorring; Ilona Koupil
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  The Mental Vitality @ Work study: design of a randomized controlled trial on the effect of a workers' health surveillance mental module for nurses and allied health professionals.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Sarah M Ketelaar; Odile Smeets; Linda Bolier; Eva Fischer; Frank J H van Dijk; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Judith K Sluiter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Sociodemographic factors associated with the use of mental health services in depressed adults: results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).

Authors:  Se Jin Park; Hong Jin Jeon; Ju Young Kim; Sohye Kim; Sungwon Roh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The Incidence of Depression among the Population of Central Kazakhstan and Its Relationship with Sociodemographic Characteristics.

Authors:  L Turgunova; Ye Laryushina; A Turmukhambetova; B Koichubekov; M Sorokina; I Korshukov
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.