Literature DB >> 20064104

A computational fluid dynamics approach to assess interhuman variability in hydrogen sulfide nasal dosimetry.

Jeffry D Schroeter1, Guilherme J M Garcia, Julia S Kimbell.   

Abstract

Human exposure to hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) gas occurs from natural and industrial sources and can result in dose-related neurological, respiratory, and cardiovascular effects. Olfactory neuronal loss in H(2)S-exposed rats has been used to develop occupational and environmental exposure limits. Using nasal computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, a correlation was found between wall mass flux and olfactory neuronal loss in rodents, suggesting an influence of airflow patterns on lesion locations that may affect interspecies extrapolation of inhaled dose. Human nasal anatomy varies considerably within a population, potentially affecting airflow patterns and dosimetry of inhaled gases. This study investigates interhuman variability of H(2)S nasal dosimetry using anatomically accurate CFD models of the nasal passages of five adults and two children generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan data. Using allometrically equivalent breathing rates, steady-state inspiratory airflow and H(2)S uptake were simulated. Approximate locations of olfactory epithelium were mapped in each model to compare air:tissue flux in the olfactory region among individuals. The fraction of total airflow to the olfactory region ranged from 2% to 16%. Despite this wide range in olfactory airflow, H(2)S dosimetry in the olfactory region was predicted to be similar among individuals. Differences in the 99 th percentile and average flux values were <1.2-fold at inhaled concentrations of 1, 5, and 10 ppm. These preliminary results suggest that differences in nasal anatomy and ventilation among adults and children do not have a significant effect on H(2)S dosimetry in the olfactory region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064104     DOI: 10.3109/08958370903278077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  6 in total

1.  Alternative approaches for acute inhalation toxicity testing to address global regulatory and non-regulatory data requirements: An international workshop report.

Authors:  Amy J Clippinger; David Allen; Annie M Jarabek; Marco Corvaro; Marianna Gaça; Sean Gehen; Jon A Hotchkiss; Grace Patlewicz; Jodie Melbourne; Paul Hinderliter; Miyoung Yoon; Dongeun Huh; Anna Lowit; Barbara Buckley; Michael Bartels; Kelly BéruBé; Daniel M Wilson; Ian Indans; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Comparison of CT-derived ventilation maps with deposition patterns of inhaled microspheres in rats.

Authors:  Richard E Jacob; Wayne J Lamm; Daniel R Einstein; Melissa A Krueger; Robb W Glenny; Richard A Corley
Journal:  Exp Lung Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 3.  The Scientific Basis for Occupational Exposure Limits for Hydrogen Sulphide-A Critical Commentary.

Authors:  Mark Elwood
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Advances in Inhalation Dosimetry Models and Methods for Occupational Risk Assessment and Exposure Limit Derivation.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Lisa M Sweeney; John B Morris; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  A deformable template method for describing and averaging the anatomical variation of the human nasal cavity.

Authors:  Alireza Nejati; Natalia Kabaliuk; Mark C Jermy; John E Cater
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  Effects of Ambient Air Pollution Exposure on Olfaction: A Review.

Authors:  Gaurav S Ajmani; Helen H Suh; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.