Literature DB >> 20063057

Comparative studies on egg, meat, and semen qualities of native and improved chicken varieties developed for backyard poultry production.

Santosh Haunshi1, Sunil Doley, G Kadirvel.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate/compare the sensory attributes of eggs and meat, egg qualities, proximate composition of eggs, and semen qualities of slow growing native (Miri and Mizo-local) and fast growing improved chicken varieties (Gramapriya and Vanaraja) under hill ecosystem of northeastern India. Significantly higher egg weight, egg volume, and albumen volume were observed in Gramapriya followed by Vanaraja, Mizo-local, and Miri chickens. However, yolk volume was significantly higher in Vanaraja and Gramapriya varieties as compared to native chickens. Yolk to albumen ratio was significantly lower in Gramapriya as compared to Vanaraja and Miri chicken. Consumer liking of eggs for aroma, flavor, and overall acceptability of Miri, Mizo-local, and Vanaraja were significantly higher than that of Gramapriya. Genetic groups did not differ significantly in appearance and proximate composition of eggs. No significant differences were observed between various genetic groups for sensory attributes of meat samples. Semen volume was significantly (p < or = 0.01) lower while sperm concentration was significantly (p < or = 0.01) higher in native chicken as compared to the improved chicken varieties. However, pH, mass activity, sperm motility, and livability did not differ significantly among genetic groups although Mizo-local had significantly higher abnormal sperm count. The study concluded that the genetic groups with different growth rate differed significantly for various egg quality parameters and semen characteristics but not for sensory attributes of meat and proximate composition of eggs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20063057     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-009-9524-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  3 in total

1.  Sensory attributes of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes raised indoors or with outdoor access.

Authors:  A C Fanatico; P B Pillai; J L Emmert; E E Gbur; J F Meullenet; C M Owens
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: sensory attributes.

Authors:  A C Fanatico; P B Pillai; L C Cavitt; J L Emmert; J F Meullenet; C M Owens
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of physical quality and composition of eggs from historic strains of single comb White Leghorn chickens.

Authors:  J B Tharrington; P A Curtis; F T Jones; K E Anderson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of two Indian native chicken breeds for reproduction traits and heritability of juvenile growth traits.

Authors:  Santosh Haunshi; Murugesan Shanmugam; Mahendra Kumar Padhi; Matam Niranjan; Ullengala Rajkumar; Maddula Ramakoti Reddy; Arun Kumar Panda
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Lipid profile of sperm cells in Thai native and commercial roosters and its impact on cryopreserved semen quality.

Authors:  Ngassa J Mussa; Ruthaiporn Ratchamak; Thanaporn Ratsiri; Thevin Vongpralub; Wuttigrai Boonkum; Yoswaris Semaming; Vibuntita Chankitisakul
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Sensory Preference and Professional Profile Affinity Definition of Endangered Native Breed Eggs Compared to Commercial Laying Lineages' Eggs.

Authors:  Antonio González Ariza; Ander Arando Arbulu; Francisco Javier Navas González; Francisco de Asís Ruíz Morales; José Manuel León Jurado; Cecilio José Barba Capote; María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Comparative study on immunoglobulin Y transfer from breeding hens to egg yolk and progeny chicks in different breeds of poultry.

Authors:  Ritu Agrawal; S D Hirpurkar; C Sannat; Amit Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-04-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.