Literature DB >> 20062931

Comparison of 4- and 64-slice CT scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Renée A Douma1, Herman M A Hofstee, Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop, Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe, Rutger J Lely, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Victor E A Gerdes, Mark H H Kramer, Harry R Büller.   

Abstract

With the introduction of multi-detector row CT (MDCT), sensitivity to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) has greatly improved. The use of newer generation CT-scans may lead to a higher prevalence and a different distribution of PE. We compared 64-slice with 4-slice MDCT regarding prevalence and distribution of PE, the number of inconclusive test results and inter-reader variability. CT-scans from a random sample of 110 consecutive patients who underwent 4-slice CT-scanning were compared with 64-slice CT-scans from 107 patients from a second cohort. Three radiologists independently reassessed all CT-scans. Consensus was reached in case of disagreement between the readers. Final diagnosis of PE was categorised as central, segmental or subsegmental by the thrombus' most proximal end. The prevalence of PE was 24% (26/110, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17-32%) and 22% (24/107, 16-31%) for the 4-slice and 64-slice cohort, respectively. The prevalence of isolated subsegmental emboli was 2/26 (7.7%; 2.1-24%) and 5/24 (21%; 9.2-41%), respectively (p=0.424). The number of inconclusive scans was 10% in both cohorts, mostly due to movement artefacts and suboptimal intravascular contrast, respectively. The inter-reader agreement between the three readers was 0.70 for the 4-slice scans and 0.68 for the 64-slice scans. Although absolute prevalence of PE was equal in both cohorts, there was a trend towards more subsegmental PE with 64-slice CT. In a multi-reader setting, the number of inconclusive examinations was higher than quoted for clinical management studies, indicating that the diagnosis of PE with MDCT could be less straightforward than assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20062931     DOI: 10.1160/TH09-06-0406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 1: epidemiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities.

Authors:  Farbod Nicholas Rahaghi; Jasleen Kaur Minhas; Gustavo A Heresi
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.878

3.  Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scanning in contemporary patients with pulmonary embolism: utilization rates and predictors of use in a multinational study.

Authors:  Pierre-Benoît Bonnefoy; Nathalie Prevot; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Alicia Sanchez; Jorge Lima; Llorenç Font; Aída Gil-Díaz; Pilar Llamas; Jesús Aibar; Behnood Bikdeli; Laurent Bertoletti; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond.

Authors:  Marika Bajc; Carl Schümichen; Thomas Grüning; Ari Lindqvist; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Adriano Alatri; Ralf W Bauer; Mirza Dilic; Brian Neilly; Hein J Verberne; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Bjorn Jonson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Arterial attenuation in individualized computed tomography pulmonary angiography injection protocol adjusted based on the patient's body mass index.

Authors:  Leila Jamali; Babak Alikhani; Tobias Getzin; Kristina Imeen Ringe; Frank K Wacker; Hans-Jürgen Raatschen
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.