Literature DB >> 2006226

Adjusting for differential base rates: Lord's paradox again.

H Wainer1.   

Abstract

When the responses of 2 or more groups to the relative effects of some stimulus are compared, it is often important to adjust statistically the estimates of those effects for baseline differences among those groups. This is often the case in experiments on heart rate for animals of different ages. How should such adjustment be done? Among the competing methodologies are (a) subtract the base rate, (b) divide by the base rate, and (c) covary out the base rate. Because each can give a different answer, the choice is crucial. This article shows that this is an example of Lord's Paradox and that Rubin's Model for the measurement of causal effects allows researchers to understand what the assumptions are underlying the validity of each adjustment strategy. The answer for heart rate data is almost surely Methodology (a).

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2006226     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  14 in total

1.  Biased parameter estimates and inflated Type I error rates in analysis of covariance (and analysis of partial variance) arising from unreliability: alternatives and remedial strategies.

Authors:  Richard E Zinbarg; Satoru Suzuki; Amanda A Uliaszek; Alison R Lewis
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Mechanisms of change in a cognitive behavioral couples prevention program: does being naughty or nice matter?

Authors:  Scott M Stanley; Galena K Rhoades; P Antonio Olmos-Gallo; Howard J Markman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2007-06-20

3.  Improper adjustment for baseline in genetic association studies of change in phenotype.

Authors:  P F McArdle; B W Whitcomb
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Dimensions of psychobiologic reactivity: Cardiovascular responses to laboratory stressors in preschool children.

Authors:  W T Boyce; A Alkon; J M Tschann; M A Chesney; B S Alpert
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1995-12

5.  Early life stress sensitizes individuals to the psychological correlates of mild fluctuations in inflammation.

Authors:  Kate R Kuhlman; Theodore F Robles; Marcie D Haydon; Larissa Dooley; Chloe C Boyle; Julienne E Bower
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being.

Authors:  Sonja Lyubomirsky; Rene Dickerhoof; Julia K Boehm; Kennon M Sheldon
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for benzodiazepines.

Authors:  B E Laurijssens; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Impaired prepulse inhibition and prepulse-elicited reactivity but intact reflex circuit excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia patients: a comparison with healthy subjects and medicated schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Philipp A Csomor; Benjamin K Yee; Joram Feldon; Anastasia Theodoridou; Erich Studerus; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  A review of neuroimaging studies of stressor-evoked blood pressure reactivity: emerging evidence for a brain-body pathway to coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  Peter J Gianaros; Lei K Sheu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Empathy manipulation impacts music-induced emotions: a psychophysiological study on opera.

Authors:  Andrei C Miu; Felicia Rodica Balteş
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.