Literature DB >> 20061970

Comparative evaluation of autogenous calvarial bone graft and alloplastic materials for secondary reconstruction of cranial defects.

Nandakishor Sahoo1, Indranil Deb Roy, Ajay Premanand Desai, Vishal Gupta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To do a comparative study and evaluate the outcome in healing of reconstructed cranial defects with an autogenous bone graft vis-à-vis alloplastic materials.
METHODS: A total of 22 patients with cranial defects were selected for this study. All the subjects were men; mean age was 27 years. Secondary reconstruction was done to obturate the defects. Of the 22 patients, 11 underwent cranioplasty with autogenous calvarial bone graft, 6 patients with a titanium mesh and 5 with a polymethylmethacrylate plate.
RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 24 months. The 11 patients who were operated on with autogenous calvarial bone grafts did not develop any postoperative infection or complications. Graft uptake was complete, and the contour of the skull was improved in all the patients. Of the 5 patients operated on for secondary reconstruction with polymethylmethacrylate plates, 3 had exposure of the implant and 1 reported with secondary infection. Of the patients where secondary reconstruction was carried out with a titanium mesh only, 1 reported with secondary infection and 2 reported with thermal sensitivity. No graft resorption was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we concluded that autogenous calvarial bone grafts have better mechanical, biologic, and immunologic properties. This procedure allows the surgeon to reconstruct moderately large cranial defect with ease of access within single or adjacent incision to the operating site with minimal postoperative morbidity and discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20061970     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3ba58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  16 in total

1.  Deformation of a Titanium Calvarial Implant following Trauma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Valerie R De Water; Ellianne J Dos Santos Rubio; Joost W Schouten; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 2.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Dipyridamole enhances osteogenesis of three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bekisz; Roberto L Flores; Lukasz Witek; Christopher D Lopez; Christopher M Runyan; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Split Calvarial Grafting for Closure of Large Cranial Defects: The Ideal Option?

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-09

5.  Use of the "mortise and tenon" principle in the augmentation of autologous cranioplasty using bone cement in a child.

Authors:  Chien-Hsun Li; Shih-Hung Yang; Huei-Shyong Wang; Yong-Kwang Tu; Meng-Fai Kuo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Single-Step Resection of Sphenoorbital Meningiomas and Orbital Reconstruction Using Customized CAD/CAM Implants.

Authors:  Lukas Goertz; Pantelis Stavrinou; George Stranjalis; Marco Timmer; Roland Goldbrunner; Boris Krischek
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Conditioning of 3D Printed Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement Scaffolds with iP-hMSCs Derived Matrix.

Authors:  Candice Sears; Eli Mondragon; Zachary I Richards; Nick Sears; David Chimene; Eoin P McNeill; Carl A Gregory; Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Roland Kaunas
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using Calcium Phosphate Cements Along with Titanium Mesh: Our Experience.

Authors:  N Girish Kumar; S Sudeep; Rahul Balwan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-21

9.  Adeno-associated virus-coated allografts: a novel approach for cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ayelet Ben Arav; Gadi Pelled; Yoram Zilberman; Nadav Kimelman-Bleich; Zulma Gazit; Edward M Schwarz; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.963

10.  Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.

Authors:  Demetri Arnaoutakis; Arash Bahrami; Jason E Cohn; Jesse E Smith
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.