Literature DB >> 20061309

Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Sorghum based on combined sequence data from cpDNA regions and ITS generate well-supported trees with two major lineages.

Dickson Ng'uni1, Mulatu Geleta, Moneim Fatih, Tomas Bryngelsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Wild Sorghum species provide novel traits for both biotic and abiotic stress resistance and yield for the improvement of cultivated sorghum. A better understanding of the phylogeny in the genus Sorghum will enhance use of the valuable agronomic traits found in wild sorghum. METHODS Four regions of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA; psbZ-trnG, trnY-trnD, trnY-psbM and trnT-trnL) and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA were used to analyse the phylogeny of sorghum based on maximum-parsimony analyses. KEY
RESULTS: Parsimony analyses of the ITS and cpDNA regions as separate or combined sequence datasets formed trees with strong bootstrap support with two lineages: the Eu-sorghum species S. laxiflorum and S. macrospermum in one and Stiposorghum and Para-sorghum in the other. Within Eu-sorghum, S. bicolor-3, -11 and -14 originating from southern Africa form a distinct clade. S. bicolor-2, originally from Yemen, is distantly related to other S. bicolor accessions.
CONCLUSIONS: Eu-sorghum species are more closely related to S. macrospermum and S. laxiflorum than to any other Australian wild Sorghum species. S. macrospermum and S. laxiflorum are so closely related that it is inappropriate to classify them in separate sections. S. almum is closely associated with S. bicolor, suggesting that the latter is the maternal parent of the former given that cpDNA is maternally inherited in angiosperms. S. bicolor-3, -11 and -14, from southern Africa, are closely related to each other but distantly related to S. bicolor-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20061309      PMCID: PMC2826255          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  16 in total

1.  Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Barry L Williams; Nicole King; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the compositae.

Authors:  B G Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  M P Simmons; H Ochoterena
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 4.  Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  I Alvarez; J F Wendel
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Genome evolution in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae).

Authors:  H James Price; Sally L Dillon; George Hodnett; William L Rooney; Larry Ross; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.

Authors:  P Taberlet; L Gielly; G Pautou; J Bouvet
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  The phylogenetic utility of chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers and the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae tribe Spermacoceae.

Authors:  Jesper Kårehed; Inge Groeninckx; Steven Dessein; Timothy J Motley; Birgitta Bremer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.

Authors:  M A Larkin; G Blackshields; N P Brown; R Chenna; P A McGettigan; H McWilliam; F Valentin; I M Wallace; A Wilm; R Lopez; J D Thompson; T J Gibson; D G Higgins
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Inferring phylogeny at low taxonomic levels: utility of rapidly evolving cpDNA and nuclear ITS loci.

Authors:  Mark E Mort; Jenny K Archibald; Christopher P Randle; Nicholas D Levsen; T Ryan O'Leary; Katarina Topalov; Catherine M Wiegand; Daniel J Crawford
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.844

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phylogenetic reconstruction using four low-copy nuclear loci strongly supports a polyphyletic origin of the genus Sorghum.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hawkins; Dhanushya Ramachandran; Ashley Henderson; Jasmine Freeman; Michael Carlise; Alex Harris; Zachary Willison-Headley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Infrageneric phylogeny and temporal divergence of Sorghum (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) based on low-copy nuclear and plastid sequences.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Huan Liu; Jun Wen; Paul M Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  B Chromosomes in Genus Sorghum (Poaceae).

Authors:  Martina Bednářová; Miroslava Karafiátová; Eva Hřibová; Jan Bartoš
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.