Literature DB >> 20060331

Prostate-specific antigen: an evolving role in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment evaluation in prostate cancer.

Heather Payne1, Philip Cornford.   

Abstract

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was introduced as a prostate cancer screening tool more than 20 years ago. However, there is continuing debate regarding its utility in screening for prostate cancer. Mass screening is costly, may result in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancers that never become clinically significant, and the evidence of a subsequent reduction in mortality is inconclusive. In addition to its role in screening, PSA is also used to monitor the progression of the disease, both localized and metastatic. Although the evidence is contradictory, PSA is still an important tool for monitoring patient progression following treatment of definitive localized prostate cancer. However, its use in monitoring castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is more controversial, particularly in the context of novel targeted treatments, which may have little impact on PSA levels. These issues highlight the urgent need to identify prostate cancer biomarkers that will improve early disease detection, increase accuracy of diagnosis, determine the aggressiveness of disease, and monitor treatment efficacy, particularly in late-stage disease. This review discusses the key issues associated with the use of PSA as an early screening tool for prostate cancer, as a prognostic marker to measure disease progression in both early- and late-stage prostate cancer, and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials with new agents.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060331     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  11 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomic imaging of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eva-Margarete Spur; Emily A Decelle; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Ganoderic Acid DM: An Alternative Agent for the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin M Johnson; Bently P Doonan; Faisal F Radwan; Azizul Haque
Journal:  Open Prost Cancer J       Date:  2010-01-01

3.  Markers of malignant prostate cancer cells: Golgi localization of α-mannosidase 1A at GM130-GRASP65 site and appearance of high mannose N-glycans on cell surface.

Authors:  Pi-Wan Cheng; Samuel Davidson; Ganapati Bhat
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Association between tumor-associated macrophages and microvessel density on prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Prahara Yuri; Ahmad Zulfan Hendri; Raden Danarto
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-07-28

5.  Evolving transcriptomic fingerprint based on genome-wide data as prognostic tools in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mark Schliekelman; Heesun Shin; Nicholas Erho; Elai Davicioni
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Relationship of age, prostate-specific antigen, and prostate volume in Indonesian men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ida Bagus O W Putra; Agus R A H Hamid; Chaidir A Mochtar; Rainy Umbas
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-03-11

7.  Novel biomarkers for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Niels Asger Jakobsen; Freddie Charles Hamdy; Richard John Bryant
Journal:  J Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-01

8.  Circulating miR-141 and miR-375 are associated with treatment outcome in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Zedan; P J S Osther; J Assenholt; J S Madsen; T F Hansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Phosphorylation of the androgen receptor by PIM1 in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Ha; N J Iqbal; P Mita; R Ruoff; W L Gerald; H Lepor; S S Taneja; P Lee; J Melamed; M J Garabedian; S K Logan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Immunochromatographic diagnostic test analysis using Google Glass.

Authors:  Steve Feng; Romain Caire; Bingen Cortazar; Mehmet Turan; Andrew Wong; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.