Literature DB >> 20060095

Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?

Giuliana Simonazzi1, Alessandra Curti, Antonio Farina, Gianluigi Pilu, Luciano Bovicelli, Nicola Rizzo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the fetal loss rate <24 weeks and the preterm premature rupture of the membranes <34 weeks' gestation according to type of invasive procedure and to sampling techniques in twins. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 204 twin pregnancies, who underwent amniocentesis (100) or chorionic villus sampling (104).
RESULTS: Fetal loss rate <4 weeks was 3.85% in chorionic villus sampling group and 4.00% in amniocentesis group (P value not significant). According to sampling technique, fetal loss rate was 4.17% (chorionic villus sampling 1 puncture), 2.70% (amniocentesis 1 puncture), 3.75% (chorionic villus sampling 2 punctures), and 4.76% (amniocentesis 2 punctures), (P values not significant). Preterm premature rupture of the membranes rate <34 weeks was 8.2% chorionic villus sampling group and 10% in amniocentesis group (P value not significant). According to sampling technique, preterm premature rupture of the membranes rate was 12.5% (chorionic villus sampling 1 puncture), 8.1% (amniocentesis 1 puncture), 6.9% (chorionic villus sampling 2 punctures), and 11.1 % (amniocentesis 2 punctures), (P values not significant).
CONCLUSION: Double entry technique does not affect significantly the outcomes evaluated, in both amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060095     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound surveillance in twin pregnancy: An update for practitioners.

Authors:  R Townsend; A Khalil
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-08-22

Review 2.  Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Joy Vink; Karin Fuchs; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  Screening and Invasive Testing in Twins.

Authors:  Giovanni Monni; Ambra Iuculano; Maria Angelica Zoppi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Current principles and practice of ethics and law in perinatal medicine.

Authors:  C Berceanu; Simona Elena Albu; Mihaela BoȚ; M Șt Ghelase
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2014-08-04

5.  Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Mi Sun Kim; Myoung Jin Moon; Sukho Kang; Sang Hee Jung; Sung Woon Chang; Hyo Jin Ki; Bohye Kim; Eunhee Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Genome-wide maps of distal gene regulatory enhancers active in the human placenta.

Authors:  Joanna Zhang; Corinne N Simonti; John A Capra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Single or double needle insertion in twin's amniocentesis: Does the technique influence the risk of complications?

Authors:  E Krispin; A Wertheimer; S Trigerman; A Ben-Haroush; I Meizner; A Wiznitzer; R Bardin
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-15

8.  Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.

Authors:  Ewelina Litwinska; Magdalena Litwinska; Bartosz Czuba; Agnieszka Gach; Sebastian Kwiatkowski; Przemyslaw Kosinski; Piotr Kaczmarek; Miroslaw Wielgos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.