Literature DB >> 20059906

Preferences of dairy cows for three stall surface materials with small amounts of bedding.

M Norring1, E Manninen, A M de Passillé, J Rushen, H Saloniemi.   

Abstract

Farmers' concerns about the economy, cost of labor, and hygiene have resulted in reduced use of organic bedding in stalls for dairy cows; however, the reduced use of organic bedding possibly impairs cow comfort. The effects of different stall surface materials were evaluated in an unheated building in which only a small amount of bedding was used. The lying time and preferences of 18 cows using 3 stall surface materials (concrete, soft rubber mat, and sand) were compared. All materials were lightly bedded with a small amount of straw, and the amount of straw added to each stall was measured. The cows only had access to stalls of one surface type while their lying time was observed. Lying times were longest on the rubber mats compared with other surfaces (rubber mat 768; concrete 727; sand 707+/-16 min/d). In a preference test, cows had access to 2 of the 3 types of stalls for 10 d and their stall preference was measured. Cows preferred stalls with rubber mats to stalls with a concrete floor (median 73 vs. 18 from a total of 160 observations per day; interquartile range was 27 and 12, respectively), but showed no preference for sand stalls compared with stalls with a concrete floor or with rubber mats. More straw was needed on sand stalls compared with concrete or mat (638+/-13 g/d on sand, 468+/-10 g/d on concrete, and 464+/-8 g/d on rubber mats). Lying times on bedded mats indicated that mats were comfortable for the cows. If availability or cost of bedding material requires limiting the amount of bedding used, rubber mats may help maintain cow comfort. Copyright 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059906     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Effect of a High Welfare Floor and a Concrete Slatted Floor on the Growth Performance, Behavior and Cleanliness of Charolais and Limousin Heifers: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jakob Leskovec; Mojca Voljč; Silvester Žgur
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?

Authors:  Silvana Mattiello; Monica Battini; Giuseppe De Rosa; Fabio Napolitano; Cathy Dwyer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Carpal, tarsal, and stifle skin lesion prevalence and potential risk factors in Swiss dairy cows kept in tie stalls: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Karin Bernhard; Beatriz Vidondo; Rahel Lisa Achermann; Rahel Rediger; Kerstin Elisabeth Müller; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.