Literature DB >> 20059719

Left ventricular ejection fraction and absence of ACE inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker predicts appropriate defibrillator therapy in the primary prevention population.

Manoj N Obeyesekere1, William Chan, Dion Stub, S Prabhu, Eliza P Teo, Geoff Toogood, Justin Mariani, Archer Broughton, Peter M Kistler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) significantly reduce mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, little is known of the predictors of appropriate device activation in the primary prevention population. The aim of the present study was to determine predictors of appropriate device therapy in patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention. METHODS &
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 35% and no prior documented ventricular arrhythmias underwent ICD implantation. The ICD implanted was single chamber in 60 (48%), dual chamber in 10 (8%), and biventricular in 56 (44%) patients and programmed with a single ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone at >180 beats per minute. Mean age was 58 +/- 13 years and mean LVEF was 23 +/- 7%. Fifty-two percent had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 66% were New York Heart Association heart failure class II/III. During a mean follow-up period of 589 +/- 353 days, 17 (13%) patients received appropriate device therapy and three (4%) received inappropriate shocks. Appropriate ICD therapy was associated with reduced LVEF (mean 19.9% vs 23.7%, P = 0.02) and the patients were less likely to have received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (AIIRB) (65% vs 90%, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed lack of ACEI/AIIRB (odds ratio [OR]= 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.01-0.37, P = <0.01) and lower LVEF (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, P = 0.02) predicted appropriate device activation. There was no difference in transplant-free survival between the appropriate therapy and no/inappropriate therapy groups, LVEF <20% and LVEF >20% group, and lack of ACEI/AIIRB and ACEI/AIIRB group.
CONCLUSION: Appropriate device activation occurred in 13% of patients in a primary prevention population. LVEF and absence of ACEI/AIIRB predicted appropriate ICD therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059719     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02669.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers on appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator shock in patients with severe systolic heart failure (from the GRADE Multicenter Study).

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Marwan M Refaat; Robert H Habib; Laila Al-Shaar; Madhurmeet Singh; Rebecca Gutmann; Heather L Bloom; Samuel C Dudley; Patrick T Ellinor; Samir F Saba; Alaa A Shalaby; Raul Weiss; Dennis M McNamara; Indrani Halder; Barry London
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Increased Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios and Low Relative Lymphocyte Counts Predict Appropriate Shocks in Heart Failure Patients with ICDs.

Authors:  Kevser Gülcihan Balci; Mustafa Mücahit Balci; Ugur Arslan; Burak Açar; Orhan Maden; Hatice Selcuk; Timur Selcuk
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  Angiotensin receptor antagonists to prevent sudden death in heart failure: does the dose matter?

Authors:  Pietro Francia; Francesca Palano; Giuliano Tocci; Carmen Adduci; Agnese Ricotta; Lorenzo Semprini; Massimo Caprinozzi; Cristina Balla; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Opportunity for improvement.

Authors:  Samaneh Salimian; Marc W Deyell; Jason G Andrade; Santabhanu Chakrabarti; Matthew T Bennett; Andrew D Krahn; Nathaniel M Hawkins
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  Follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: comparison of coronary artery disease and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M P Verhagen; N van Boven; J H Ruiter; G-J P Kimman; G J Tahapary; V A Umans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.