Literature DB >> 20059384

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation of radiofrequency ablation of the prostate: a canine model.

Bin Hu1, Bing Hu, Lei Chen, Jia Li, Jin Huang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Currently, there is no reliable method of monitoring the propagation of radiofrequency lesions in real time. We report our animal experience using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to evaluate the lesion produced by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a canine model and investigate the feasibility to predict these lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five male beagle dogs underwent RFA of the prostate. Radiofrequency was delivered under transrectal ultrasonography guidance. We created a lesion in the right and left lateral lobes of canine prostate. Post-RFA lesion size was measured with conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced low-mechanical index perfusion imaging (ESAOTE DU8, CnTI) with a second-generation contrast agent (Sonovue). The prostates were assessed for a contrast void corresponding to the ablated tissue. All dogs were then immediately killed, and the prostates were harvested for pathologic analysis. The gross RFA lesions were measured to compare lesion size with that measured using CEUS.
RESULTS: The RFA lesions could not be imaged accurately in real time with conventional grayscale or power Doppler sonography. With CEUS imaging, a clear lesion was identified at the site of each RFA application. As measured by CEUS, the lesions volume averaged 1.30 +/- 0.50 cm(3), compared with 1.32 +/- 0.53 cm(3) by measurement in the gross specimen (p = 0.324).
CONCLUSIONS: CEUS appears to be an accurate modality for immediate monitoring of RFA procedure. Further study is necessary to assess the clinical utility of CEUS for monitoring RFA of localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059384     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Comparative study of conventional US, contrast enhanced US and enhanced MR for the follow-up of prostatic radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Chao Feng; Bin Hu; Bing Hu; Lei Chen; Jia Li; Jin Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Image guidance for focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  U Lindner; N Lawrentschuk; J Trachtenberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nishanth Krishnananthan; Uri Lindner; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  The prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Francesca Patella; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Edoardo Zanchetta; Chiara Floridi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Chloë Standaert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: The current status.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Samir Taneja
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.