Literature DB >> 20059313

Ensuring quality in studies linking cancer registries and biobanks.

Hilde Langseth1, Tapio Luostarinen, Freddie Bray, Joakim Dillner.   

Abstract

The Nordic countries have a long tradition of providing comparable and high quality cancer data through the national population-based cancer registries and the capability to link the diverse large-scale biobanks currently in operation. The joining of these two infrastructural resources can provide a study base for large-scale studies of etiology, treatment and early detection of cancer. Research projects based on combined data from cancer registries and biobanks provides great opportunities, but also presents major challenges. Biorepositories have become an important resource in molecular epidemiology, and the increased interest in performing etiological, clinical and gene-environment-interaction studies, involving information from biological samples linked to population-based cancer registries, warrants a joint evaluation of the quality aspects of the two resources, as well as an assessment of whether the resources can be successfully combined into a high quality study. While the quality of biospecimen handling and analysis is commonly considered in different studies, the logistics of data handling including the linkage of the biobank with the cancer registry is an overlooked aspect of a biobank-based study. It is thus the aim of this paper to describe recommendations on data handling, in particular the linkage of biobank material to cancer registry data and the quality aspects thereof, based on the experience of Nordic collaborative projects combining data from cancer registries and biobanks. We propose a standard documentation with respect to the following topics: the quality control aspects of cancer registration, the identification of cases and controls, the identification and use of data confounders, the stability of serum components, historical storage conditions, aliquoting history, the number of freeze/thaw cycles and available volumes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059313     DOI: 10.3109/02841860903447069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  Variation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell RNA Quality in Archived Samples.

Authors:  Zisis Kozlakidis; Christine Mant; Fartun Abdinur; Andrew Cope; Szabi Steiner; Mark Peakman; Adrian Hayday; John Cason
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Feasibility of linking population-based cancer registries and cancer center biorepositories.

Authors:  Margaret E McCusker; Rosemary D Cress; Mark Allen; Allyn Fernandez-Ami; Regina Gandour-Edwards
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Impact of Specimen Heterogeneity on Biomarkers in Repository Samples from Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A SWOG Report.

Authors:  Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan; Anna Moseley; Megan Othus; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas R Chauncey; I-Ming L Chen; Harry P Erba; John E Godwin; Min Fang; Kenneth J Kopecky; Alan F List; Galina L Pogosov; Jerald P Radich; Cheryl L Willman; Brent L Wood; Soheil Meshinchi; Derek L Stirewalt
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Prediagnostic Serum Organochlorine Concentrations and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study in the Norwegian Janus Serum Bank Cohort.

Authors:  Stella Koutros; Hilde Langseth; Tom K Grimsrud; Dana Boyd Barr; Roel Vermeulen; Lützen Portengen; Sholom Wacholder; Laura E Beane Freeman; Aaron Blair; Richard B Hayes; Nathaniel Rothman; Lawrence S Engel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.