Literature DB >> 20059000

Thermal effects generated by high-intensity focused ultrasound beams at normal incidence to a bone surface.

Diane M Nell1, Matthew R Myers.   

Abstract

Experiments and computations were performed to study factors affecting thermal safety when high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) beams are normally incident (i.e., beam axis normal to the interface) upon a bone/soft-tissue interface. In particular, the temperature rise and thermal dose were determined as a function of separation between the beam focus and the interface. Under conditions representative of clinical HIFU procedures, it was found that the thermal dose at the bone surface can exceed the threshold for necrosis even when the beam focus is more than 4 cm from the bone. Experiments showed that reflection of the HIFU beam from the bone back into the transducer introduced temperature fluctuations of as much as +/-15% and may be an important consideration for safety analyses at sufficiently high acoustic power. The applicability of linear propagation models in predicting thermal dose near the interface was also addressed. Linear models, while underpredicting thermal dose at the focus, provided a conservative (slight overprediction) estimate of thermal dose at the bone surface. Finally, temperature rise due to absorption of shear waves generated by the HIFU beam in the bone was computed. Modeling shear-wave propagation in the thermal analysis showed that the predicted temperature rise off axis was as much as 30% higher when absorption of shear waves is included, indicating that enhanced heating due to shear-wave absorption is potentially important, even for normally incident HIFU beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059000     DOI: 10.1121/1.3257547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Thermal safety of ultrasound-enhanced ocular drug delivery: A modeling study.

Authors:  Marjan Nabili; Craig Geist; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Identification of possible factors influencing temperatures elevation during implant site preparation with piezoelectric technique.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Orlando Brugnoletti; Girolamo Garreffa; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-02-09

3.  Acoustic access to the prostate for extracorporeal ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Timothy L Hall; Christopher R Hempel; Brian J Sabb; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Focused ultrasound ablation of a large canine oral tumor achieves efficient tumor remission: a case report.

Authors:  Ashish Ranjan; Deepan Kishore; Harshini Ashar; Tina Neel; Akansha Singh; Sunil More
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Safety limitations of MR-HIFU treatment near interfaces: a phantom validation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hipp; Ari Partanen; Gregory S Karczmar; Xiaobing Fan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Temperature changes caused by the difference in the distance between the ultrasound transducer and bone during 1 mhz and 3 mhz continuous ultrasound: a phantom study.

Authors:  Akihiko Ohwatashi; Satoshi Ikeda; Katsuhiro Harada; Yurie Kamikawa; Akira Yoshida; Kazuhiro Inoue; Nobuhiko Yanagida; Kiyohiro Fukudome; Ryoji Kiyama; Tadasu Ohshige; Tetsuo Maeda
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09

7.  Experimental Verification of Modeled Thermal Distribution Produced by a Piston Source in Physiotherapy Ultrasound.

Authors:  M I Gutierrez; S A Lopez-Haro; A Vera; L Leija
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.