BACKGROUND: Patient copayments for all medical services have increased dramatically. There are few data available regarding how copayments have changed for services commonly considered to be quality indicators. OBJECTIVE: Describe the relative change in copayments for services used as quality indicators and interventions subject to programs to control utilization. DESIGN: A large claims database was used to assess copayment changes from 2001 to 2006 for selected drug and non-drug services in patient cohorts with specific chronic diseases. SUBJECTS: Approximately 5 million commercially-insured individuals enrolled in a variety of fee-for-service and capitated health plans. MEASUREMENTS: Copayment trends were calculated as the change in the average amount paid per unit service from 2001 to 2006. RESULTS: Out-of-pocket payments for services targeted by quality improvement initiatives increased substantially [>50%] and in a similar magnitude to interventions subject to programs to control their use. For prescription drugs, the trend was driven more by copayment increases for branded medications [$10 per prescription] than for generic drugs [$2 per prescription]. Copayments for non-drug preventive services rose modestly. CONCLUSIONS: Benefit designers should consider reversing the trend of copayment increases for services considered to be indicators of high quality care.
BACKGROUND:Patient copayments for all medical services have increased dramatically. There are few data available regarding how copayments have changed for services commonly considered to be quality indicators. OBJECTIVE: Describe the relative change in copayments for services used as quality indicators and interventions subject to programs to control utilization. DESIGN: A large claims database was used to assess copayment changes from 2001 to 2006 for selected drug and non-drug services in patient cohorts with specific chronic diseases. SUBJECTS: Approximately 5 million commercially-insured individuals enrolled in a variety of fee-for-service and capitated health plans. MEASUREMENTS: Copayment trends were calculated as the change in the average amount paid per unit service from 2001 to 2006. RESULTS: Out-of-pocket payments for services targeted by quality improvement initiatives increased substantially [>50%] and in a similar magnitude to interventions subject to programs to control their use. For prescription drugs, the trend was driven more by copayment increases for branded medications [$10 per prescription] than for generic drugs [$2 per prescription]. Copayments for non-drug preventive services rose modestly. CONCLUSIONS: Benefit designers should consider reversing the trend of copayment increases for services considered to be indicators of high quality care.
Authors: Michael E Chernew; Mayur R Shah; Arnold Wegh; Stephen N Rosenberg; Iver A Juster; Allison B Rosen; Michael C Sokol; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; A Mark Fendrick Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Jose J Escarce; Jennifer E Pace; Matthew D Solomon; Marianne Laouri; Pamela B Landsman; Steven M Teutsch Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Jacqueline W Miller; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; Erica Breslau; Meredith L Shoemaker Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: A Mark Fendrick; Jason D Buxbaum; Yuexin Tang; Anna Vlahiotis; Donna McMorrow; Swapnil Rajpathak; Michael E Chernew Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-11-01