OBJECTIVE: Cysteine-rich protein (CRP) 1 and 2 are cytoskeletal lin-11 isl-1 mec-3 (LIM)-domain proteins thought to be critical for smooth muscle differentiation. Loss of murine CRP2 does not overtly affect smooth muscle differentiation or vascular function but does exacerbate neointima formation in response to vascular injury. Because CRPs 1 and 2 are coexpressed in the vasculature, we hypothesize that CRPs 1 and 2 act redundantly in smooth muscle differentiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We generated Csrp1 (gene name for CRP1) null mice by genetic ablation of the Csrp1 gene and found that mice lacking CRP1 are viable and fertile. Smooth muscle-containing tissues from Csrp1-null mice are morphologically indistinguishable from wild-type mice and have normal contractile properties. Mice lacking CRPs 1 and 2 are viable and fertile, ruling out functional redundancy between these 2 highly related proteins as a cause for the lack of an overt phenotype in the Csrp1-null mice. Csrp1-null mice challenged by wire-induced arterial injury display reduced neointima formation, opposite to that seen in Csrp2-null mice, whereas Csrp1/Csrp2 double-null mice produce a wild-type response. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle CRPs are not essential for normal smooth muscle differentiation during development, but may act antagonistically to modulate the smooth muscle response to pathophysiological stress.
OBJECTIVE:Cysteine-rich protein (CRP) 1 and 2 are cytoskeletal lin-11 isl-1 mec-3 (LIM)-domain proteins thought to be critical for smooth muscle differentiation. Loss of murineCRP2 does not overtly affect smooth muscle differentiation or vascular function but does exacerbate neointima formation in response to vascular injury. Because CRPs 1 and 2 are coexpressed in the vasculature, we hypothesize that CRPs 1 and 2 act redundantly in smooth muscle differentiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We generated Csrp1 (gene name for CRP1) null mice by genetic ablation of the Csrp1 gene and found that mice lacking CRP1 are viable and fertile. Smooth muscle-containing tissues from Csrp1-null mice are morphologically indistinguishable from wild-type mice and have normal contractile properties. Mice lacking CRPs 1 and 2 are viable and fertile, ruling out functional redundancy between these 2 highly related proteins as a cause for the lack of an overt phenotype in the Csrp1-null mice. Csrp1-null mice challenged by wire-induced arterial injury display reduced neointima formation, opposite to that seen in Csrp2-null mice, whereas Csrp1/Csrp2 double-null mice produce a wild-type response. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle CRPs are not essential for normal smooth muscle differentiation during development, but may act antagonistically to modulate the smooth muscle response to pathophysiological stress.
Authors: James R Henderson; Doris Brown; James A Richardson; Eric N Olson; Mary C Beckerle Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Z Su; A Yao; I Zubair; K Sugishita; M Ritter; F Li; J J Hunter; K R Chien; W H Barry Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: David F Chang; Narasimhaswamy S Belaguli; Dinakar Iyer; Wilmer B Roberts; San-Pin Wu; Xiu-Rong Dong; Joseph G Marx; Mary Shannon Moore; Mary C Beckerle; Mark W Majesky; Robert J Schwartz Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Rebecca L Sayers; Liisa J Sundberg-Smith; Mauricio Rojas; Haruko Hayasaka; J Thomas Parsons; Christopher P Mack; Joan M Taylor Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Danny Halim; Michael P Wilson; Daniel Oliver; Erwin Brosens; Joke B G M Verheij; Yu Han; Vivek Nanda; Qing Lyu; Michael Doukas; Hans Stoop; Rutger W W Brouwer; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Orazio J Slivano; Alan J Burns; Christine K Christie; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; Alice S Brooks; Dick Tibboel; Suowen Xu; Zheng Gen Jin; Tono Djuwantono; Wei Yan; Maria M Alves; Robert M W Hofstra; Joseph M Miano Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Deborah Weighill; Marouen Ben Guebila; Kimberly Glass; John Quackenbush; John Platig Journal: Genome Res Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Natalie Längst; Julia Adler; Anna Kuret; Andreas Peter; Peter Ruth; Karsten Boldt; Robert Lukowski Journal: Cells Date: 2022-04-17 Impact factor: 7.666
Authors: Kendra M Black; Akihiro Masuzawa; Robert C Hagberg; Kamal R Khabbaz; Mary E Trovato; Verna M Rettagliati; Manoj K Bhasin; Simon T Dillon; Towia A Libermann; Ioannis K Toumpoulis; Sidney Levitsky; James D McCully Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 5.501