Literature DB >> 20054656

The Functional Living Index-Cancer: estimating its reliability based on clinical trial data.

Annouschka Laenen1, Ariel Alonso.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Functional Living Index-Cancer was developed to measure quality of life in cancer trials as an adjunct to the usual clinical outcomes. The scale is considered conceptually good, since it covers a broad range of relevant aspects of quality of life, but the main criticism has been that its reliability has never been properly investigated. In this paper, we investigate the reliability of the FLIC.
METHODS: We apply a new methodology based on linear mixed models that allows estimating reliability from real clinical data. The reliability of the FLIC is estimated using data coming from a longitudinal study in breast cancer. With this new approach, we avoid the need for additional data collection on which classical reliability studies are based.
RESULTS: The average reliability of the FLIC over the repeated measurements is satisfactory, even though the initial measurement in the study showed a somewhat lower value. Taking into account the longitudinal character of the measurements, we show that highly reliable information can be obtained with a relatively small number of measurements per patient.
CONCLUSION: The FLIC provides reliable quality of life measurements in patients with breast cancer. Additional studies would be welcome to validate these results in other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20054656     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9568-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  8 in total

1.  The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials.

Authors:  John M Lachin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Randomized phase III trial comparing the new potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitor vorozole with megestrol acetate in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients. North American Vorozole Study Group.

Authors:  P E Goss; E P Winer; I F Tannock; L H Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: psychometric properties of instruments.

Authors:  F C van Knippenberg; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements.

Authors:  M R Novick; C Lewis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Measuring quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  K Donovan; R W Sanson-Fisher; S Redman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Measurement of quality of life in patients: psychometric analyses of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC).

Authors:  G R Morrow; J Lindke; P Black
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Functional Living Index-Cancer is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Alvina H K Lee; Stewart Y Tung; Janet Y H Wong; Y M Chan; Cynthia R Goh; Y B Cheung
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.