Literature DB >> 20054174

Economic costs of abdominal obesity.

Betina Højgaard1, Kim Rose Olsen, Jes Søgaard, Thorkild I A Sørensen, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine the relationship between waist circumference and future health care costs across a broad range of waist circumference values based on individual level data.
METHOD: A prospective cohort of 31,840 subjects aged 50-64 years at baseline had health status, lifestyle and socio-economic aspects assessed at entry. Individual data on health care consumption and associated costs were extracted from registers for the subsequent 7 years. Participants were stratified by presence of chronic disease at entry.
RESULTS: Increased waist circumference at baseline was associated with higher future health care costs. For increased and substantially increased waist circumference health care costs rise at a rate of 1.25% in women and 2.08% in men, per added centimetre above normal waistline. Thus, as an example, a woman with a waistline of 95 cm and without co-morbidities can be expected to incur an added future cost of approximately USD 397.- per annum compared to a woman in the normal waist circumference group, corresponding to 22% higher health care costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Future health care costs are higher for persons who have an increased waist circumference, which suggests that there may be a potential for significant resource savings through prevention of abdominal obesity. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20054174      PMCID: PMC6452114          DOI: 10.1159/000137822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Facts        ISSN: 1662-4025            Impact factor:   3.942


  6 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of URMEL-ICE, a school-based overweight prevention programme comprising metabolism, exercise and lifestyle intervention in children.

Authors:  Dorothea Kesztyüs; Anja Schreiber; Tamara Wirt; Martina Wiedom; Jens Dreyhaupt; Susanne Brandstetter; Benjamin Koch; Olivia Wartha; Rainer Muche; Martin Wabitsch; Reinhold Kilian; Jürgen M Steinacker
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-11

2.  The Socioeconomic Burden of Obesity.

Authors:  Jakob Kjellberg; Arendse Tange Larsen; Rikke Ibsen; Betina Højgaard
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  Body adiposity index utilization in a Spanish Mediterranean population: comparison with the body mass index.

Authors:  Angel A López; Mey L Cespedes; Teofila Vicente; Matias Tomas; Miguel Bennasar-Veny; Pedro Tauler; Antoni Aguilo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impact of BMI and BMI change on future drug expenditures in adults: results from the MONICA/KORA cohort study.

Authors:  Christina M Teuner; Petra Menn; Margit Heier; Rolf Holle; Jürgen John; Silke B Wolfenstetter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of taxes on nonalcoholic beverages and high-in-fat foods as a means to prevent obesity trends.

Authors:  Nikolaos Maniadakis; Vasiliki Kapaki; Louiza Damianidi; Georgia Kourlaba
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-10-22

6.  The Risk of Abdominal Obesity according to the Degree of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Korean Men.

Authors:  Sung Keun Park; Jae-Hong Ryoo; Joong-Myung Choi; Min Woo Seo; Chung Min Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.