Literature DB >> 20054025

A prospective observational study of catheter-related bacteraemia and thrombosis in a haemodialysis cohort: univariate and multivariate analyses of risk association.

Peter Thomson1, Catherine Stirling, Jamie Traynor, Scott Morris, Robert Mactier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheterization is a fundamental component in delivering haemodialysis yet is associated with significantly higher complication rates than other methods of vascular access. In this study, we report results of univariate and multivariate analyses designed to identify and quantify independent risk association for catheterization type, clinical variables and laboratory variables with regard to the development of catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) and catheter failure due to poor haemodialysis flow.
METHODS: A 2-year prospective study of all incident haemodialysis vascular access catheter insertions was conducted. Laboratory and clinical variables were recorded at catheter insertion, and the clinical course was followed up to the point of catheter removal. CRB and catheter failure due to poor flow were recorded as outcome events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to test for association between clinical and laboratory variables and outcome.
RESULTS: Forty-four thousand five hundred seventy-six catheter days were accumulated over the study period. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent association between non-tunnelled catheterization procedures and adverse outcomes compared with tunnelled central venous catheter insertions. Elevated modified Charlson comorbidity score was independently associated with the development of CRBc. Elevated C-reactive protein and low haemodialysis blood pump flow were independently associated with catheter failure due to poor flow.
CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that tunnelled central venous catheter insertions have an association with lower complication rates than non-tunnelled central venous catheter insertions that is independent of whether patients have acute or chronic renal failure, or high levels of comorbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20054025     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  7 in total

1.  A single institutional experience of conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison to de novo placement.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Bajaj; Joseph Ciacci; Matthias Kirsch; John D Ebersole
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators confer survival benefit in patients with renal insufficiency but not in dialysis-dependent patients.

Authors:  Faris Khan; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Interventions for treating central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction.

Authors:  Alice L Kennard; Giles D Walters; Simon H Jiang; Girish S Talaulikar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-26

4.  Immediate access arteriovenous grafts versus tunnelled central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma Aitken; Colin Geddes; Pete Thomson; Ram Kasthuri; Mohan Chandramohan; Colin Berry; David Kingsmore
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Risk factors for catheter-related infections in patients receiving permanent dialysis catheter.

Authors:  Fani Delistefani; Manuel Wallbach; Gerhard A Müller; Michael J Koziolek; Clemens Grupp
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  A meta-analysis of mortality in end-stage renal disease patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

Authors:  Tien-Hsing Chen; Hung-Ta Wo; Po-Cheng Chang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Ming-Shien Wen; Chung-Chuan Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Precurved non-tunnelled catheters for haemodialysis are comparable in terms of infections and malfunction as compared to tunnelled catheters: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mathijs van Oevelen; Alferso C Abrahams; Marcel C Weijmer; Tjerko Nagtegaal; Friedo W Dekker; Joris I Rotmans; Sabine Ca Meijvis
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 2.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.