Literature DB >> 20053856

Performance of fusidic acid (CEM-102) susceptibility testing reagents: broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods as applied to Staphylococcus aureus.

Ronald N Jones1, Mariana Castanheira, Paul R Rhomberg, Leah N Woosley, Michael A Pfaller.   

Abstract

Fusidic acid (CEM-102) is an established antistaphylococcal agent that has been used in clinical practice for more than 4 decades. The activity of fusidic acid against 778 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus collected from U.S. (53.8% were methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) and Canadian (46.5% were MRSA) medical centers was assessed to determine the intermethod accuracy of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Etest methods. Broth microdilution MIC results were compared by scattergram analysis to zone diameters around commercially available 5- and 10-microg disks. Acceptable correlation (r = 0.74 to 0.76) was observed for the two disk concentrations, and applying breakpoints of < or = 1 microg/ml (> or = 22 mm) for susceptibility (S) and > or = 4 microg/ml (< or = 19 mm) for resistance (R) provided 99.9% absolute intermethod categorical agreement. Reference CLSI MIC versus Etest MIC results (r = 0.77; 728 strains) showed 55.4% identical results and agreement of 99.7% +/- one log2 dilution. The diagnostic susceptibility testing reagents (including Etest) for fusidic acid (CEM-102) performed at an excellent level of intermethod agreement for the proposed breakpoint criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053856      PMCID: PMC2832462          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01829-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Correlation of MIC methods and tentative interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility testing using NCCLS methodology for fusidic acid.

Authors:  R Skov; N Frimodt-Møller; F Espersen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 2.  Dumb and dumber--the potential waste of a useful antistaphylococcal agent: emerging fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Gregory J Moran; Anusha Krishnadasan; Rachel J Gorwitz; Gregory E Fosheim; Linda K McDougal; Roberta B Carey; David A Talan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Compensatory adaptation to the loss of biological fitness associated with acquisition of fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Silke Besier; Albrecht Ludwig; Volker Brade; Thomas A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pathogen of occurrence and susceptibility patterns associated with pneumonia in hospitalized patients in North America: results of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study (2000).

Authors:  Daryl J Hoban; Douglas J Biedenbach; Alan H Mutnick; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Disk diffusion interpretive criteria for fusidic acid susceptibility testing of staphylococci by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method.

Authors:  C Coutant; D Olden; J Bell; J D Turnidge
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 8.  Fusidic acid: new opportunities with an old antibiotic.

Authors:  J D Anderson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-04-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D Dobie; J Gray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Antimicrobial activity of fusidic acid and disk diffusion susceptibility testing criteria for gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  E Toma; D Barriault
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Fusidic Acid: A Bacterial Elongation Factor Inhibitor for the Oral Treatment of Acute and Chronic Staphylococcal Infections.

Authors:  Prabhavathi Fernandes
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Synthesis of Fusidic Acid Derivatives Yields a Potent Antibiotic with an Improved Resistance Profile.

Authors:  Martin Garcia Chavez; Alfredo Garcia; Hyang Yeon Lee; Gee W Lau; Erica N Parker; Kailey E Komnick; Paul J Hergenrother
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.084

3.  Fusidic acid and clindamycin resistance in community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children of Central Greece.

Authors:  George D Katopodis; Ioanna N Grivea; Angeliki J Tsantsaridou; Spyros Pournaras; Efi Petinaki; George A Syrogiannopoulos
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Methyl gallate from Galla rhois successfully controls clinical isolates of Salmonella infection in both in vitro and in vivo systems.

Authors:  Jang-Gi Choi; Su-Hyun Mun; Harendra S Chahar; Preeti Bharaj; Ok-Hwa Kang; Se-Gun Kim; Dong-Won Shin; Dong-Yeul Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mehdi Goudarzi; Bahareh Hajikhani; Sareh Kakavandi; Sana Amini; Samira Zamani; Alex van Belkum; Hossein Goudarzi; Masoud Dadashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.454

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.