Literature DB >> 20053779

Preclinical in vivo evaluation of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a novel MEK1/2 kinase inhibitor RO5068760 in multiple tumor models.

Sherif Daouti1, Brian Higgins, Kenneth Kolinsky, Kathryn Packman, Huisheng Wang, Christine Rizzo, John Moliterni, Nicholas Huby, Nader Fotouhi, Mei Liu, Petra Goelzer, Harpreet K Sandhu, Jia Kui Li, Aruna Railkar, David Heimbrook, Huifeng Niu.   

Abstract

Targeting the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway represents a promising anticancer strategy. Recently, we have reported a novel class of potent and selective non-ATP-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitors with a unique structure and mechanism of action. RO5068760 is a representative of this class showing significant efficacy in a broad spectrum of tumors with aberrant mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. To understand the relationship between systemic exposures and target (MEK1/2) inhibition as well as tumor growth inhibition, the current study presents a detailed in vivo characterization of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RO5068760 in multiple xenograft tumor models. For inhibition of MEK1/2 as measured by the phosphorylated ERK levels, the estimated EC(50)s in plasma were 1.36 micromol/L (880 ng/mL) and 3.35 micromol/L (2168 ng/mL) in LOX melanoma and HT-29 colorectal cancer models, respectively. A similar EC(50) (1.41 micromol/L or 915 ng/mL) was observed in monkey peripheral blood lymphocytes. To achieve tumor growth inhibition (>or=90%), an average plasma drug concentration of 0.65 or 5.23 micromol/L was required in B-RafV600E or K-Ras mutant tumor models, respectively, which were remarkably similar to the IC(90) values (0.64 or 4.1 micromol/L) determined in vitro for cellular growth inhibition. With equivalent in vivo systemic exposures, RO5068760 showed superior efficacy in tumors harboring B-RafV600E mutation. The plasma concentration time profiles indicate that constant p-ERK suppression (>50%) may not be required for optimal efficacy, especially in highly responsive tumors. This study may facilitate future clinical trial design in using biochemical markers for early proof of mechanism and in selecting the right patients and optimal dose regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053779     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  13 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the MAPK pathway in melanoma: why some approaches succeed and other fail.

Authors:  Gajanan S Inamdar; SubbaRao V Madhunapantula; Gavin P Robertson
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 2.  Targeting the MAPK-RAS-RAF signaling pathway in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Libero Santarpia; Scott M Lippman; Adel K El-Naggar
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.902

3.  Raf family kinases: old dogs have learned new tricks.

Authors:  David Matallanas; Marc Birtwistle; David Romano; Armin Zebisch; Jens Rauch; Alexander von Kriegsheim; Walter Kolch
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-03

Review 4.  From basic research to clinical development of MEK1/2 inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christophe Frémin; Sylvain Meloche
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 5.  Current and future trials of targeted therapies in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Matthew S Evans; Subbarao V Madhunapantula; Gavin P Robertson; Joseph J Drabick
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Targeting mutant KRAS for anticancer therapeutics: a review of novel small molecule modulators.

Authors:  Yuanxiang Wang; Christine E Kaiser; Brendan Frett; Hong-Yu Li
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Role of intracellular signaling pathways and their inhibitors in the treatment of inflammation.

Authors:  Namrata P Nailwal; Gaurav M Doshi
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Impact of KRAS Mutations on Management of Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kevin M Sullivan; Peter S Kozuch
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-03-15

9.  Isoform- and Phosphorylation-specific Multiplexed Quantitative Pharmacodynamics of Drugs Targeting PI3K and MAPK Signaling in Xenograft Models and Clinical Biopsies.

Authors:  William G Herrick; Casey L Kilpatrick; Melinda G Hollingshead; Dominic Esposito; Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne; Andrea M Gross; Barry C Johnson; Alice P Chen; Brigitte C Widemann; James H Doroshow; Ralph E Parchment; Apurva K Srivastava
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.009

10.  KRAS mutational subtype and copy number predict in vitro response of human pancreatic cancer cell lines to MEK inhibition.

Authors:  H Hamidi; M Lu; K Chau; L Anderson; M Fejzo; C Ginther; R Linnartz; A Zubel; D J Slamon; R S Finn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.