Literature DB >> 20053644

Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience.

Tim W Fawcett1, Rufus A Johnstone.   

Abstract

Winner and loser effects, in which the outcome of an aggressive encounter influences the tendency to escalate future conflicts, have been documented in many taxa, but we have limited understanding of why they have evolved. One possibility is that individuals use previous victories and defeats to assess their fighting ability relative to others. We explored this idea by modelling a population of strong and weak individuals that do not know their own strength, but keep track of how many fights they have won. Under these conditions, adaptive behaviour generates clear winner and loser effects: individuals who win fights should escalate subsequent conflicts, whereas those who lose should retreat from aggressive opponents. But these effects depend strongly on age and experience. Young, naive individuals should show highly aggressive behaviour and pronounced loser effects. For these inexperienced individuals, fighting is especially profitable because it yields valuable information about their strength. Aggression should then decline as an individual ages and gains experience, with those who lose fights becoming more submissive. Older individuals, who have a better idea of their own strength, should be more strongly influenced by victories than losses. In conclusion, we predict that both aggressiveness and the relative magnitude of winner and loser effects should change with age, owing to changes in how individuals perceive their own strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053644      PMCID: PMC2871944          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  Hawks, doves, and mixed-symmetry games.

Authors:  P H Crowley
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  If animals know their own fighting ability, the evolutionarily stable level of fighting is reduced.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.

Authors:  Yuying Hsu; Ryan L Earley; Larry L Wolf
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-02

5.  The effect of severe defeat at various age levels on the aggressive behavior of mice.

Authors:  M W KAHN
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 1.509

6.  Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Social isolation increases social display after priming in Betta splendens but decreases aggressive readiness.

Authors:  J R Halperin; D W Dunham; S Ye
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Early social enrichment shapes social behavior and nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in the adult mouse brain.

Authors:  Igor Branchi; Ivana D'Andrea; Marco Fiore; Veronica Di Fausto; Luigi Aloe; Enrico Alleva
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  19 in total

1.  Self-organizing dominance hierarchies in a wild primate population.

Authors:  Mathias Franz; Emily McLean; Jenny Tung; Jeanne Altmann; Susan C Alberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Loser-effect duration evolves independently of fighting ability.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Yasukazu Okada; Sasha R X Dall; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Using knowledge from human research to improve understanding of contest theory and contest dynamics.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Khandis Blake; Thomas F Denson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sibling rivalry: training effects, emergence of dominance and incomplete control.

Authors:  Sarah Benhaiem; Heribert Hofer; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt; Edgar Brunner; Marion L East
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Integrating personality research and animal contest theory: aggressiveness in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Marloes de Boer; Gareth Arnott; Andrew Grimmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Lan; Yuying Hsu
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Winner and loser effects are modulated by hormonal states.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley; Chung-Kai Lu; I-Han Lee; Stephanie C Wong; Yuying Hsu
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 8.  Testosterone and reproductive effort in male primates.

Authors:  Martin N Muller
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Emergence of Leadership within a Homogeneous Group.

Authors:  Brent E Eskridge; Elizabeth Valle; Ingo Schlupp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of age and experience on contest behavior in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Victoria E Lee; Megan L Head; Mauricio J Carter; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.