| Literature DB >> 20053286 |
Carolyn Y Tam1, Lisa J Martin, Gregory Hislop, Anthony J Hanley, Salomon Minkin, Norman F Boyd.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Striking differences exist between countries in the incidence of breast cancer. The causes of these differences are unknown, but because incidence rates change in migrants, they are thought to be due to lifestyle rather than genetic differences. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to examine breast cancer risk factors in populations with different risks for breast cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20053286 PMCID: PMC2880420 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466
Selected characteristics of subjects by study groupa
| Mean (SD) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21 | Recent Chinese migrants |
| |||||
| Caucasians |
|
|
|
| |||
| (N = 413) | (N = 216) | (N = 421) | |||||
| Age (years) | 61.5 (6.9) | 58.5 (6.7) | 60.3 (6.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.03 | 0.004 |
| Years lived in Western countries (years) | 61.3 (6.9) | 46.2 (12.7) | 6.7 (2.9) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Education (% yes) | |||||||
| Less than 8 years | 1.0 | 3.3 | 15.0 | ||||
| 8 to 11 years | 9.7 | 10.7 | 16.9 | ||||
| High School | 20.9 | 24.2 | 22.8 | <0.001 | 0.04 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Vocational/Technical School | 7.5 | 10.2 | 9.0 | ||||
| College | 31.1 | 20.9 | 19.0 | ||||
| Bachelor's Degree or higher | 29.7 | 30.7 | 17.3 | ||||
a P values were based on ANOVA for continuous variables and on chi-square tests for categorical variables. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. Continuous variables are expressed as means (SD). Categorical variables are expressed as percent.
b P values for ethnicity effect
c P values for comparing Caucasians and Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21
d P values for comparing Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants
e P values for comparing Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and recent Chinese migrants
Reproductive risk factors by study groupa
| Adjusted Mean (Lower and Upper 95% Confidence Limits) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Caucasians | Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21 | Recent Chinese migrants |
|
|
|
| |
| (N = 413) | (N = 216) | (N = 421) | |||||
| Age at menarche (years)f, g | 12.8 (12.6, 13.0) | 13.0 (12.7, 13.2) | 13.7 (13.6, 13.9) | 0.01 | 0.64 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Age at first live birth (years)f, h | 24.3 (23.8, 24.7) | 24.9 (24.3, 25.5) | 25.5 (25.1, 25.9) | 0.002 | 0.34 | <0.001 | 0.22 |
| Number of live births (%) | |||||||
| 0 | 14.5 (11.3, 18.5) | 8.5 (5.2, 13.8) | 4.5 (2.8, 7.2) | 0.60 | 0.14 | <0.001 | 0.19 |
| 1 | 9.9 (7.3, 13.2) | 7.7 (4.6, 12.7) | 18.0 (14.3, 22.4) | 0.08 | 0.99 | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| 2 | 36.9 (32.3, 41.8) | 40.1 (33.2, 47.4) | 43.3 (38.5, 48.2) | 0.14 | 0.99 | 0.22 | 0.99 |
| 3 | 21.6 (17.7, 26.1) | 30.8 (24.7, 37.7) | 19.6 (15.9, 37.7) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 0.008 |
| ≥ 4 | 11.9 (8.9, 15.9) | 5.3 (2.9, 9.6) | 8.0 (5.7, 11.2) | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| Breastfeeding (% yes) | 76.6 (71.6, 80.9) | 63.4 (55.9, 70.2) | 72.1 (66.9, 76.8) | <0.001 | 0.62 | <0.001 | 0.14 |
| Age at natural menopause (years)f, i | 50.1 (49.7, 50.6) | 50.6 (50.0, 51.3) | 49.9 (49.5, 50.3) | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.99 | 0.10 |
| Age at surgical menopause with both ovaries removed (years)f, j | 44.0 (41.2, 46.9) | 45.0 (41.3, 48.9) | 45.0 (42.2, 48.0) | 0.68 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Ever used oral contraceptives (% yes) | 85.8 (81.4, 89.3) | 73.9 (67.3, 79.6) | 40.7 (35.9, 45.7) | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Duration of oral contraceptive use (years)f, k | 3.6 (3.0, 4.3) | 2.5 (2.0, 3.2) | 2.1 (1.7, 2.6) | 0.14 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.81 |
| Ever used hormone replacement therapy (% yes) | 47.4 (41.7, 53.1) | 33.1 (26.6, 40.3) | 28.1 (23.9, 32.6) | 0.03 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.65 |
| Duration of hormone replacement therapy use (years)f, l | 2.1 (1.6, 2.8) | 1.7 (1.2, 2.6) | 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.17 |
a P values were based on ANCOVA for continuous variables and logistic regression for binary variables, adjusting for age, education, and age × ethnicity. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. Variables are expressed as adjusted means.
b P values for ethnicity effect.
c P values for comparing Caucasians and Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21.
d P values for comparing Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants.
e P values for comparing Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and recent Chinese migrants.
f Log transformed.
g There were 3 missing values for Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and 2 missing values for recent Chinese migrants.
h Sample size was 344 Caucasians, 191 Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21, and 397 recent Chinese migrants.
i Sample size was 274 Caucasians, 159 Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21, and 345 recent Chinese migrants.
j Sample size was 28 Caucasians, 13 Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21, and 24 recent Chinese migrants.
k Sample size of oral contraceptive uses was 313 Caucasians, 154 Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21, and 169 for recent Chinese migrants.
l Sample size of hormone replacement therapy users was 201 Caucasians, 68 Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21, and 118 recent Chinese migrants.
Anthropometric risk factors by study groupa
| Adjusted Mean (Lower and Upper 95% Confidence Limits) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Caucasians | Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21 | Recent Chinese migrants |
|
|
|
| |
| (N = 382) | (N = 53) | (N = 357) | |||||
| Standing height (cm) | 162.1 (161.4, 162.8) | 156.3 (154.6, 157.9) | 155.8 (155.3, 156.4) | 0.03 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Weight (kg) | 69.5 (68.1, 70.9) | 57.7 (54.8, 60.8) | 55.2 (54.2, 56.3) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.35 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.4 (25.9, 26.9) | 23.6 (22.5, 24.8) | 22.7 (22.4, 23.1) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.40 |
| Sitting height (cm) | 85.0 (84.6, 85.4) | 83.5 (82.6, 84.5) | 83.3 (83.0, 83.7) | 0.06 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Leg length (cm) | 77.1 (76.6, 77.6) | 72.7 (71.5, 73.9) | 72.0 (72.0, 72.9) | 0.14 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 84.6 (83.3, 85.8) | 77.4 (74.6, 80.4) | 76.6 (75.6, 77.6) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 104.5 (103.4, 105.6) | 94.5 (92.1, 97.0) | 93.4 (92.6, 94.3) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Subscapular skinfold (mm) | 30.0 (28.8, 31.3) | 30.9 (27.8, 34.5) | 27.3 (26.3, 28.4) | 0.65 | 0.99 | 0.002 | 0.10 |
| Suprailiac skinfold (mm) | 30.9 (29.3, 32.5) | 30.8 (27.0, 35.2) | 27.7 (26.4, 29.0) | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.003 | 0.38 |
| Triceps skinfold (mm) | 33.4 (32.3, 34.5) | 32.9 (30.2, 35.8) | 29.4 (28.5, 30.3) | 0.04 | 0.99 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
a P values were based on ANCOVA, adjusting for age, education, age × ethnicity, and study site. Log transformation was used. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. Variables are expressed as adjusted means. Sample size for Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 was much smaller than that for the other two groups because the selection criteria for these subjects were relaxed. Participation in the home interview for anthropometric measurements was optional. We did not get full participation from all Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants because some of these subjects declined measurements after recruitment.
b P values for ethnicity effect
c P values for comparing Caucasians and Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21
d P values for comparing Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants
e P values for comparing Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and recent Chinese migrants
Other risk factors by study groupa
| Adjusted Mean (Lower and Upper 95% Confidence Limits) (% Yes) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Caucasians | Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21 | Recent Chinese migrants |
|
|
|
| |
| (N = 413) | (N = 216) | (N = 421) | |||||
| First degree relatives with breast cancer | 16.0 (12.0, 21.1) | 14.7 (10.0, 21.0) | 7.8 (5.5, 11.0) | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.003 | 0.04 |
| Any benign breast biopsy | 14.8 (11.5, 18.9) | 8.7 (5.5, 8.2) | 5.4 (3.5, 8.2) | 0.04 | 0.10 | <0.001 | 0.39 |
| Consumption of alcohol at least once per week for six months or longer | 60.6 (53.5, 67.2) | 9.4 (6.0, 14.4) | 2.3 (1.2, 4.2) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Consumption of alcohol at least once per week currently | 50.9 (45.7, 56.0) | 8.7 (5.6, 13.4) | 1.4 (0.6, 3.3) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Smoked at least one cigarette per day for three months or longer | 46.5 (39.1, 54.1) | 12.4 (8.2, 18.2) | 1.7 (0.8, 3.6) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Smoking at least one cigarette per day | 11.0 (8.2, 14.6) | 3.3 (1.5, 6.7) | 0.5 (0.1, 1.9) | 0.01 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
| Currently | |||||||
| Any X-ray examinations that included the chest areag | 73.7 (67.4, 79.1) | 78.5 (71.1, 84.4) | 97.4 (95.3, 98.5) | 0.20 | 0.69 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Any X-ray examination for tuberculosisg | 58.3 (51.6, 64.7) | 71.9 (64.3, 78.4) | 96.4 (94.2, 97.9) | 0.09 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
a P values were based on logistic regression, adjusting for age, education, and age × ethnicity. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. Variables are expressed as adjusted means.
b P values for ethnicity effect
c P values for comparing Caucasians and Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21
d P values for comparing Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants
e P values for comparing Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and recent Chinese migrants
f There were 22 missing values for Caucasians, 21 for Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21, and 38 for recent Chinese migrants.
g There were seven missing values for Caucasians and six for Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21.
Dietary acculturation by study group
| Caucasians | Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before 21 | Recent Chinese migrants |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| (N = 379) | (N = 152) | (N = 374) | |||||
| Chinese dietary practices (% yes) | |||||||
| Eat tofu | 20.8 | 89.5 | 95.7 | ||||
| Eat traditionally preserved/pickled vegetables | 40.1 | 49.3 | 56.7 | ||||
| Balance yin/yang foods | 7.1 | 23.7 | 33.2 | ||||
| Avoid cold foods and drinks | 11.9 | 29.0 | 44.7 | ||||
| Eat a Chinese style breakfast (for example,. congee) | 5.0 | 46.1 | 65.5 | ||||
| Chinese Dietary Acculturation Scoref | 0.09 (0.08, 0.12) | 0.42 (0.37, 0.47) | 0.56 (0.53, 0.60) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [Adjusted Mean (95% Confidence Limits)] | |||||||
| Western dietary practices (% yes) | |||||||
| Eat bread, rolls, or bagels | 96.6 | 94.1 | 94.9 | ||||
| Drink carbonated beverages | 63.9 | 50.0 | 27.0 | ||||
| Eat ground beef or hamburgers | 77.6 | 59.9 | 30.5 | ||||
| Eat pizza or spaghetti with tomato sauce | 89.2 | 79.6 | 52.7 | ||||
| Eat any kind of cheese | 97.1 | 80.3 | 49.7 | ||||
| Drink milk or eat milk products | 94.5 | 87.5 | 89.6 | ||||
| Eat cakes, pies, or cookies for dessert | 92.7 | 94.7 | 80.0 | ||||
| Eat packaged or prepared foods (for example, TV dinners) | 42.5 | 50.0 | 40.1 | ||||
| Eat at Western fast food restaurants | 40.9 | 50.0 | 33.2 | ||||
| Eat between meals | 81.3 | 90.1 | 80.9 | ||||
| Western Dietary Acculturation Scoreg | 0.80 (0.78, 0.81) | 0.77 (0.74, 0.79) | 0.64 (0.61, 0.66) | <0.001 | 0.10 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| [Adjusted Mean (95% Confidence Limits)] | |||||||
a P values were based on ANCOVA, adjusting for age, education, and age × ethnicity. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.
b P values for ethnicity effect
c P values for comparing Caucasians and Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21
d P values for comparing Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants
e P values for comparing Chinese born in the West or migrated to the West before age 21 and recent Chinese migrants
f Square-root transformed. The scores ranged from 0 to 1. A high score indicates positive association with Chinese dietary practices.
g Cube transformed. The scores ranged from 0 to 1. A high score indicates positive association with Western dietary practices.
Selected breast cancer risk factors in recent Chinese migrants by place of origina
| Adjusted Mean (Lower and Upper 95% Confidence Limits) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | Had lived in both | From |
| ||||
| Mainland | Mainland China | Hong Kong |
|
|
|
| |
| China | and Hong Kong | ||||||
| (N = 147) | (N = 141) | (N = 133) | |||||
| Age at menarche (years)f, g | 14.3 (14.1, 14.6) | 13.7 (13.4, 13.9) | 13.0 (12.7, 13.3) | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.003 |
| Age at first live birth (years)f, h | 24.6 (24.0, 25.2) | 25.7 (25.0, 26.3) | 26.3 (25.6, 27.0) | 0.003 | 0.07 | 0.003 | 0.47 |
| Parity (% yes) | 99.0 (95.5, 99.8) | 97.4 (93.1, 99.0) | 94.4 (87.9, 97.5) | 0.06 | 0.86 | 0.12 | 0.53 |
| Breastfeeding (% yes) | 95.4 (89.9, 98.0) | 66.7 (56.9, 75.1) | 45.1 (34.1, 56.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 |
| Ever used oral contraceptives (% yes) | 29.5 (21.7, 38.8) | 41.4 (32.8, 50.5) | 49.6 (39.9, 59.4) | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.64 |
| Ever used hormone therapy (% yes)i | 12.8 (8.0, 19.7) | 37.8 (30.0, 46.9) | 35.6 (26.8, 45.4) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.99 |
| Standing height (cm)j | 156.5 (155.4, 157.5) | 156.6 (155.6, 157.5) | 154.5 (153.5, 155.6) | 0.009 | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Weight (kg)j | 55.9 (54.3, 57.6) | 55.5 (54.0, 56.9) | 53.8 (52.3, 55.4) | 0.15 | 0.99 | 0.22 | 0.34 |
| BMI (kg/m2)j | 22.9 (22.3, 23.5) | 22.6 (22.1, 23.2) | 22.5 (22.0, 23.1) | 0.77 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| First degree history of breast cancer (% yes)k | 4.4 (1.9, 9.7) | 5.1 (2.3, 10.8) | 14.3 (8.3, 23.4) | 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Any benign breast biopsy (% yes) | 2.9 (1.2, 7.0) | 4.4 (1.9, 9.6) | 7.8 (3.9, 14.9) | 0.21 | 0.99 | 0.26 | 0.81 |
| Chinese Dietary Acculturation Scorel, m | 0.64 (0.59, 0.68) | 0.58 (0.54, 0.63) | 0.50 (0.46, 0.54) | <0.001 | 0.34 | <0.001 | 0.006 |
| Western Dietary Acculturation Scorem, n | 0.62 (0.58, 0.66) | 0.65 (0.61, 0.68) | 0.65 (0.62, 0.68) | 0.50 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 0.99 |
a P values were based on ANCOVA for continuous variables and logistic regression for binary variables, adjusting for age, education, and years lived in the West. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. Variables are expressed as adjusted means.
b P values for ethnicity effect
c P values for comparing recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China and recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong
d P values for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China and recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong
e P values for comparing recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong and recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong
f Log transformed
g There was 1 missing value for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China and 1 missing value for recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong.
h Sample size was 144 for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China, 133 for recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong, and 120 for recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong.
i There were 2 missing values for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China
j There were 33 missing for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China, 18 for recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong, and 13 for recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong.
k There were 5 missing values for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China, 21 for recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong, and 12 for recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong.
l Square-root transformed. The scores ranged from 0 to 1. A high score indicates positive association with Chinese dietary practices.
m There were 26 missing values for recent Chinese migrants from Mainland China, 12 for recent Chinese migrants who had lived in both Mainland China and Hong Kong, and 9 for recent Chinese migrants from Hong Kong.
n Cube transformed. The scores ranged from 0 to 1. A high score indicates positive association with Western dietary practices.
Selected breast cancer risk factors in recent Chinese migrants and postmenopausal Chinese women living in urban China
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recent Chinese Migrants | Postmenopausal | Recent Chinese Migrants | Postmenopausal | |||
| From Mainland China | Chinese Women |
| From Hong Kong | Chinese Women |
| |
| in This Study | Living in Shanghaib | in This Study | Living in Hong Kong | |||
| High school or higher (% yes) | 74.2 | 64.0 | 0.12 | 74.4 | NAc | NA |
| Age at menarche (years) | 14.6 (1.8) | 15.0 (2.0) | 0.03 | 12.8 (1.9) | 15.1 (2.3)d | <0.001 |
| Age at first live birth (years) | 25.2 (3.6) | 24.0 (4.0) | 0.001 | 26.9 (3.9) | NAc | NA |
| Number of live births | 2.2 (1.1) | 2.3 (1.0) | 0.30 | 2.1 (1.4) | 2.0 (2.0)e | 0.59 |
| Age at natural menopause (years) | 50.0 (3.4) | 48.0 (5.0) | <0.001 | 50.0 (3.2) | 49.4 (3.4)c | 0.08 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.2 (3.0) | 24.2 (3.6) | 0.002 | 22.6 (3.2) | 22.2 (3.8)e to 23.6 (3.4)d | 0.58f |
a P values were based on chi-square significance test for educational attainment and t-tests for the rest of the variables.
b Data obtained from reference 10.
c Data is not available.
d Data obtained from reference 9
e Data obtained from reference 8
f Weighted mean was used for postmenopausal Chinese women living in Hong Kong when making the comparison.
Figure 1Estimated five-year absolute risk for breast cancer in Caucasians. Application of the Gail Model to estimate five-year absolute risk for breast cancer in Caucasians with (a) risk factor profile of Caucasians (b) risk factor profile of Western born Chinese and early Chinese migrants (c) risk factor profile of recent Chinese migrants. P values were based on ANCOVA, adjusting for age. Log Transformation was used. P values: Ethnicity effect: <0.001; Caucasians vs. Chinese born in the West or early Chinese migrants: 0.35; Caucasians vs. recent Chinese migrants: <0.001; and Chinese born in the West or early Chinese migrants vs. recent Chinese migrants: 0.005.