Literature DB >> 20053057

Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis.

Gillian Rhodes1, Hanne C Lie, Louise Ewing, Emma Evangelista, James W Tanaka.   

Abstract

Discrimination and recognition are often poorer for other-race than own-race faces. These other-race effects (OREs) have traditionally been attributed to reduced perceptual expertise, resulting from more limited experience, with other-race faces. However, recent findings suggest that sociocognitive factors, such as reduced motivation to individuate other-race faces, may also contribute. If the sociocognitive hypothesis is correct, then it should be possible to alter discrimination and memory performance for identical faces by altering their perceived race. We made identical ambiguous-race morphed faces look either Asian or Caucasian by presenting them in Caucasian or Asian face contexts, respectively. However, this perceived-race manipulation had no effect on either discrimination (Experiment 1) or memory (Experiment 2) for the ambiguous-race faces, despite the presence of the usual OREs in discrimination and recognition of unambiguous Asian and Caucasian faces in our participant population. These results provide no support for the sociocognitive hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053057     DOI: 10.1037/a0017680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation.

Authors:  Eve Willadsen-Jensen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Same faces, different labels: generating the cross-race effect in face memory with social category information.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

3.  Contextual Variation in Automatic Evaluative Bias to Racially-Ambiguous Faces.

Authors:  Tiffany A Ito; Eve C Willadsen-Jensen; Jesse T Kaye; Bernadette Park
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-07

4.  Why Some Faces will Not be Remembered: Current ERP Evidence on Memory Encoding for Other-Race and Other-Age Faces.

Authors:  Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Why Some Faces won't be Remembered: Brain Potentials Illuminate Successful Versus Unsuccessful Encoding for Same-Race and Other-Race Faces.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Joan Y Chiao; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.