Literature DB >> 20053046

Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.

Troy A Smith1, Daniel R Kimball.   

Abstract

Most modern research on the effects of feedback during learning has assumed that feedback is an error correction mechanism. Recent studies of feedback-timing effects have suggested that feedback might also strengthen initially correct responses. In an experiment involving cued recall of trivia facts, we directly tested several theories of feedback-timing effects and also examined the effects of restudy and retest trials following immediate and delayed feedback. Results were not consistent with theories assuming that the only function of feedback is to correct initial errors but instead supported a theoretical account assuming that delaying feedback strengthens initially correct responses due to the spacing of encoding opportunities: Delaying feedback increased the probability of correct response perseveration on the final retention test but had minimal effects on error correction or error perseveration probabilities. In a 2nd experiment, the effects of varying the lags between study, test, and feedback trials during learning provided further support for the spacing hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053046     DOI: 10.1037/a0017407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning.

Authors:  Matthew Jensen Hays; Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

2.  An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.

Authors:  Kathleen A Mangiapanello; Nancy S Hemmes
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-01-14

3.  Error discounting in probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  Stewart Craig; Stephan Lewandowsky; Daniel R Little
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Learning from errors: Exploration of the monitoring learning effect.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz; Gary S Dell; Adelyn Brecher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Benefiting from trial spacing without the cost of prolonged training: Frequency, not duration, of trials with absent stimuli enhances perceived contingency.

Authors:  Santiago Castiello; Ralph R Miller; James E Witnauer; Doriann M Alcaide; Ethan Fung; Riddhi J Pitliya; Dyedra K C Morrissey; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Correcting false memories: Errors must be noticed and replaced.

Authors:  Hillary G Mullet; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

7.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence.

Authors:  Danielle M Sitzman; Matthew G Rhodes; Sarah K Tauber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

9.  Test-enhanced learning: analysis of an experience with undergraduate nursing students.

Authors:  Linda Messineo; Manuel Gentile; Mario Allegra
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Reinforcement and Punishment Shape the Learning Dynamics in fMRI Neurofeedback.

Authors:  Manfred Klöbl; Paul Michenthaler; Godber Mathis Godbersen; Simon Robinson; Andreas Hahn; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.