Literature DB >> 20053043

Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task.

Mary Hegarty1, Matt S Canham, Sara I Fabrikant.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined how bottom-up and top-down processes interact when people view and make inferences from complex visual displays (weather maps). Bottom-up effects of display design were investigated by manipulating the relative visual salience of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information across different maps. Top-down effects of domain knowledge were investigated by examining performance and eye fixations before and after participants learned relevant meteorological principles. Map design and knowledge interacted such that salience had no effect on performance before participants learned the meteorological principles; however, after learning, participants were more accurate if they viewed maps that made task-relevant information more visually salient. Effects of display design on task performance were somewhat dissociated from effects of display design on eye fixations. The results support a model in which eye fixations are directed primarily by top-down factors (task and domain knowledge). They suggest that good display design facilitates performance not just by guiding where viewers look in a complex display but also by facilitating processing of the visual features that represent task-relevant information at a given display location. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053043     DOI: 10.1037/a0017683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  Salience to relevance.

Authors:  Bang Wong
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  When do spatial abilities support student comprehension of STEM visualizations?

Authors:  Scott R Hinze; Vickie M Williamson; Mary Jane Shultz; Kenneth C Williamson; Ghislain Deslongchamps; David N Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-05

3.  The theory-based influence of map features on risk beliefs: self-reports of what is seen and understood for maps depicting an environmental health hazard.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Christine Vatovec
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 4.  Attention-Setting and Human Mental Function.

Authors:  Thomas Sanocki; Jong Han Lee
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  The influence of environmental hazard maps on risk beliefs, emotion, and health-related behavioral intentions.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Looking to score: the dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene.

Authors:  Shuichiro Taya; David Windridge; Magda Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Personal and Network Dynamics in Performance of Knowledge Workers: A Study of Australian Breast Radiologists.

Authors:  Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba; Liaquat Hossain; Robert Heard; Patrick Brennan; Warwick Lee; Sarah Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning to interpret topographic maps: Understanding layered spatial information.

Authors:  Kinnari Atit; Steven M Weisberg; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Flexibility in data interpretation: effects of representational format.

Authors:  David W Braithwaite; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-31

10.  Representation control increases task efficiency in complex graphical representations.

Authors:  Julia Moritz; Hauke S Meyerhoff; Claudia Meyer-Dernbecher; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.