Literature DB >> 20053039

The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases.

Travis J Carter1, Thomas Gilovich.   

Abstract

When it comes to spending disposable income, experiential purchases tend to make people happier than material purchases (Van Boven & Gilovich, 2003). But why are experiences more satisfying? We propose that the evaluation of experiences tends to be less comparative than that of material possessions, such that potentially invidious comparisons have less impact on satisfaction with experiences than with material possessions. Support for this contention was obtained in 8 studies. We found that participants were less satisfied with their material purchases because they were more likely to ruminate about unchosen options (Study 1); that participants tended to maximize when selecting material goods and satisfice when selecting experiences (Study 2); that participants examined unchosen material purchases more than unchosen experiential purchases (Study 3); and that, relative to experiences, participants' satisfaction with their material possessions was undermined more by comparisons to other available options (Studies 4 and 5A), to the same option at a different price (Studies 5B and 6), and to the purchases of other individuals (Study 5C). Our results suggest that experiential purchase decisions are easier to make and more conducive to well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053039     DOI: 10.1037/a0017145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Asymmetric Hedonic Contrast: Pain Is More Contrast Dependent Than Pleasure.

Authors:  Guy Voichek; Nathan Novemsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-06-04

2.  Maximizing Without Borders: Evidence That Maximizing Transcends Decision Domains.

Authors:  Michail D Kokkoris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-15

3.  Using prosocial behavior to safeguard mental health and foster emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A registered report protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrew Miles; Meena Andiappan; Laura Upenieks; Christos Orfanidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The Role of Subjective and Objective Social Status in the Generation of Envy.

Authors:  Henrietta Bolló; Dzsenifer Roxána Háger; Manuel Galvan; Gábor Orosz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Using prosocial behavior to safeguard mental health and foster emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A registered report of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrew Miles; Meena Andiappan; Laura Upenieks; Christos Orfanidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Consumers' willingness to pay premium under the influence of consumer community culture: From the perspective of the content creator.

Authors:  Jifan Ren; Jialiang Yang; Erhao Liu; Fangfang Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  What triggers envy on Social Network Sites? A comparison between shared experiential and material purchases.

Authors:  Ruoyun Lin; Niels van de Ven; Sonja Utz
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2018-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.