BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (ES) was a malignant tumor of bone or soft tissue. One of the few risk factors for developing ES is race, with a higher incidence noted in populations of European rather than African or Asian ancestry. The goal of the current study was to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in presentation and overall survival (OS) among patients diagnosed with ES before age 40 years. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database identified 1715 patients aged <40 years who were diagnosed with ES between 1973 and 2005. Racial and ethnic group differences were compared using chi-square tests. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank tests and Cox models. RESULTS: Black patients had significantly more soft-tissue tumors compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P <.0001). Asian and white Hispanic patients were found to have an intermediate frequency of soft-tissue tumors that also differed from white non-Hispanic patients (P <.0001). White Hispanic patients presented with a higher proportion of larger tumors compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P = .042). Black patients tended to be older than white non-Hispanic patients (P = .012). Sex, frequency of pelvic tumors, and metastatic status did not appear to differ by ethnicity or race. OS was found to differ according to race and ethnicity. Even after controlling for known confounders, OS was significantly worse for black, Asian, and white Hispanic patients compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P = .0031, P = .0182, and P = .0051, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic and racial differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients with ES do exist. Understanding the etiology of these differences will require further study.
BACKGROUND:Ewing sarcoma (ES) was a malignant tumor of bone or soft tissue. One of the few risk factors for developing ES is race, with a higher incidence noted in populations of European rather than African or Asian ancestry. The goal of the current study was to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in presentation and overall survival (OS) among patients diagnosed with ES before age 40 years. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database identified 1715 patients aged <40 years who were diagnosed with ES between 1973 and 2005. Racial and ethnic group differences were compared using chi-square tests. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank tests and Cox models. RESULTS: Black patients had significantly more soft-tissue tumors compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P <.0001). Asian and white Hispanic patients were found to have an intermediate frequency of soft-tissue tumors that also differed from white non-Hispanic patients (P <.0001). White Hispanic patients presented with a higher proportion of larger tumors compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P = .042). Black patients tended to be older than white non-Hispanic patients (P = .012). Sex, frequency of pelvic tumors, and metastatic status did not appear to differ by ethnicity or race. OS was found to differ according to race and ethnicity. Even after controlling for known confounders, OS was significantly worse for black, Asian, and white Hispanic patients compared with white non-Hispanic patients (P = .0031, P = .0182, and P = .0051, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic and racial differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients with ES do exist. Understanding the etiology of these differences will require further study.
Authors: M Paulussen; S Ahrens; J Dunst; W Winkelmann; G U Exner; R Kotz; G Amann; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; D Harms; S Müller-Weihrich; K Welte; B Kornhuber; G Janka-Schaub; U Göbel; J Treuner; P A Voûte; A Zoubek; H Gadner; H Jürgens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T Ozaki; K-L Schaefer; D Wai; R Yokoyama; S Ahrens; R Diallo; T Hasegawa; T Shimoda; S Hirohashi; A Kawai; N Naito; Y Morimoto; H Inoue; W Boecker; H Juergens; W Winkelmann; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; C Poremba Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ching-Hon Pui; John T Sandlund; Deqing Pei; Gaston K Rivera; Scott C Howard; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Bassem I Razzouk; Melissa M Hudson; Cheng Cheng; Susana C Raimondi; Frederick G Behm; James R Downing; Mary V Relling; William E Evans Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Smita Bhatia; Harland N Sather; Nyla A Heerema; Michael E Trigg; Paul S Gaynon; Leslie L Robison Journal: Blood Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: O Oberlin; M C Deley; B N Bui; J C Gentet; T Philip; P Terrier; C Carrie; F Mechinaud; C Schmitt; A Babin-Boillettot; J Michon Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-11-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M Beth McCarville; Jim Y Chen; Jamie L Coleman; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Elisabeth E Adderson; Mike D Neel; Robert E Gold; Robert A Kaufman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jeremy M Sharib; Jobin Cyrus; Andrew Horvai; Florette K Gray Hazard; John Neuhaus; Katherine K Matthay; Robert Goldsby; Neyssa Marina; Steven G DuBois Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Jennifer Worch; Jobin Cyrus; Robert Goldsby; Katherine K Matthay; John Neuhaus; Steven G DuBois Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Larry E Kun; Chia-Ho Hua; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Robert A Sanford; Frederick A Boop Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Erin E Karski; Elizabeth McIlvaine; Mark R Segal; Mark Krailo; Holcombe E Grier; Linda Granowetter; Richard B Womer; Paul A Meyers; Judy Felgenhauer; Neyssa Marina; Steven G DuBois Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Robert Beck; Michael J Monument; W Scott Watkins; Richard Smith; Kenneth M Boucher; Joshua D Schiffman; Lynn B Jorde; R Lor Randall; Stephen L Lessnick Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2012-06