Literature DB >> 20052630

Effect of race and ethnicity classification on survey estimates: Anomaly of the weighted totals of American Indians and Alaska Natives.

Sunghee Lee1, Delight E Satter, Ninez A Ponce.   

Abstract

Racial classification is a paramount concern in data collection and analysis for American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) and has far-reaching implications in health research. We examine how different racial classifications affect survey weights and consequently change health-related indicators for the AI/AN population in California. Using a very large random population-based sample of AI/ANs, we compared the impact of three weighting strategies on counts and rates of selected health indicators. We found that different weights examined in this study did not change the percentage estimates of health-related variables for AI/ANs, but did influence the population total estimates dramatically. In survey data, different racial classifications and tabulations of AI/ANs could yield discrepancies in weighted estimates for the AI/AN population. Policy makers need to be aware that the choice of racial classification schemes for this racial-political group can generally influence the data they use for decision making.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20052630     DOI: 10.5820/aian.1603.2009.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res        ISSN: 1533-7731


  1 in total

1.  MEASURING EVERYDAY RACIAL/ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH SURVEYS: How Best to Ask the Questions, in One or Two Stages, Across Multiple Racial/Ethnic Groups?

Authors:  Salma Shariff-Marco; Nancy Breen; Hope Landrine; Bryce B Reeve; Nancy Krieger; Gilbert C Gee; David R Williams; Vickie M Mays; Ninez A Ponce; Margarita Alegría; Benmei Liu; Gordon Willis; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  Du Bois Rev       Date:  2011-04-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.