Literature DB >> 20051684

The independent evolution of the enlargement of the principal sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve in three different groups of birds.

Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez1, Andrew N Iwaniuk, Douglas R Wylie.   

Abstract

In vertebrates, sensory specializations are usually correlated with increases in the brain areas associated with that specialization. This correlation is called the 'principle of proper mass' whereby the size of a neural structure is a reflection of the complexity of the behavior that it subserves. In recent years, several comparative studies have revealed examples of this principle in the visual and auditory system of birds, but somatosensory specializations have largely been ignored. Many species rely heavily on tactile information during feeding. Input from the beak, tongue and face, conveyed via the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves, is first processed in the brain by the principal sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve (PrV) in the brainstem. Previous studies report that PrV is enlarged in some species that rely heavily on tactile input when feeding, but no extensive comparative studies have been performed. In this study, we assessed the volume of PrV in 73 species of birds to present a detailed analysis of the relative size variation of PrV using both conventional and phylogenetically based statistics. Overall, our results indicate that three distinct groups of birds have a hypertrophied PrV: waterfowl (Anseriformes), beak-probing shorebirds (Charadriiformes), and parrots (Psittaciformes). These three groups have different sensory requirements from the orofacial region. For example, beak-probing shorebirds use pressure information from the tip of the beak to find buried prey in soft substrates, whereas waterfowl, especially filter-feeding ducks, use information from the beak, palate, and tongue when feeding. Parrots likely require increased sensitivity in the tongue to manipulate food items. Thus, despite all sharing an enlarged PrV and feeding behaviors dependent on tactile input, each group has different requirements that have led to the independent evolution of a large PrV. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20051684     DOI: 10.1159/000270904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  22 in total

1.  Vision, touch and object manipulation in Senegal parrots Poicephalus senegalus.

Authors:  Zoe P Demery; Jackie Chappell; Graham R Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Karyn Stecyk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Brian K Schmidt; Jeremy R Corfield; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Neuronal mechanism for acute mechanosensitivity in tactile-foraging waterfowl.

Authors:  Eve R Schneider; Marco Mastrotto; Willem J Laursen; Vincent P Schulz; Jena B Goodman; Owen H Funk; Patrick G Gallagher; Elena O Gracheva; Sviatoslav N Bagriantsev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Evolutionary Specialization of Tactile Perception in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Eve R Schneider; Elena O Gracheva; Slav N Bagriantsev
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-05

5.  Molecular basis of tactile specialization in the duck bill.

Authors:  Eve R Schneider; Evan O Anderson; Marco Mastrotto; Jon D Matson; Vincent P Schulz; Patrick G Gallagher; Robert H LaMotte; Elena O Gracheva; Sviatoslav N Bagriantsev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Avian cerebellar floccular fossa size is not a proxy for flying ability in birds.

Authors:  Stig A Walsh; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Monja A Knoll; Estelle Bourdon; Paul M Barrett; Angela C Milner; Robert L Nudds; Richard L Abel; Patricia Dello Sterpaio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Developmental Modes and Developmental Mechanisms can Channel Brain Evolution.

Authors:  Christine J Charvet; Georg F Striedter
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.856

8.  A star in the brainstem reveals the first step of cortical magnification.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania; Duncan B Leitch; Danielle Gauthier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional implications of species differences in the size and morphology of the isthmo optic nucleus (ION) in birds.

Authors:  Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Thomas J Lisney; Macarena Faunes; Gonzalo J Marín; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interspecies avian brain chimeras reveal that large brain size differences are influenced by cell-interdependent processes.

Authors:  Chun-Chun Chen; Evan Balaban; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.