OBJECTIVES: Geographic information systems (GIS) tools can help expand our understanding of disparities in health outcomes within a community. The purpose of this project was (1) to demonstrate the methods to link a disease management registry with a GIS mapping and analysis program, (2) to address the challenges that occur when performing this link, and (3) to analyze the outcome disparities resulting from this assessment tool in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We used registry data derived from the University of California Davis Health System's electronic medical record system to identify patients with diabetes mellitus from a network of 13 primary care clinics in the greater Sacramento area. This information was converted to a database file for use in the GIS software. Geocoding was performed and after excluding those who had unknown home addresses we matched 8528 unique patient records with their respective home addresses. Socioeconomic and demographic data were obtained from the Geolytics, Inc. (East Brunswick, NJ), a provider of US Census Bureau data, with 2008 estimates and projections. Patient, socioeconomic, and demographic data were then joined to a single database. We conducted regression analysis assessing A1c level based on each patient's demographic and laboratory characteristics and their neighborhood characteristics (socioeconomic status [SES] quintile). Similar analysis was done for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. RESULTS: After excluding ineligible patients, the data from 7288 patients were analyzed. The most notable findings were as follows: There was, there was found an association between neighborhood SES and A1c. SES was not associated with low-density lipoprotein control. CONCLUSION: GIS methodology can assist primary care physicians and provide guidance for disease management programs. It can also help health systems in their mission to improve the health of a community. Our analysis found that neighborhood SES was a barrier to optimal glucose control but not to lipid control. This research provides an example of a useful application of GIS analyses applied to large data sets now available in electronic medical records.
OBJECTIVES: Geographic information systems (GIS) tools can help expand our understanding of disparities in health outcomes within a community. The purpose of this project was (1) to demonstrate the methods to link a disease management registry with a GIS mapping and analysis program, (2) to address the challenges that occur when performing this link, and (3) to analyze the outcome disparities resulting from this assessment tool in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We used registry data derived from the University of California Davis Health System's electronic medical record system to identify patients with diabetes mellitus from a network of 13 primary care clinics in the greater Sacramento area. This information was converted to a database file for use in the GIS software. Geocoding was performed and after excluding those who had unknown home addresses we matched 8528 unique patient records with their respective home addresses. Socioeconomic and demographic data were obtained from the Geolytics, Inc. (East Brunswick, NJ), a provider of US Census Bureau data, with 2008 estimates and projections. Patient, socioeconomic, and demographic data were then joined to a single database. We conducted regression analysis assessing A1c level based on each patient's demographic and laboratory characteristics and their neighborhood characteristics (socioeconomic status [SES] quintile). Similar analysis was done for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. RESULTS: After excluding ineligible patients, the data from 7288 patients were analyzed. The most notable findings were as follows: There was, there was found an association between neighborhood SES and A1c. SES was not associated with low-density lipoprotein control. CONCLUSION: GIS methodology can assist primary care physicians and provide guidance for disease management programs. It can also help health systems in their mission to improve the health of a community. Our analysis found that neighborhood SES was a barrier to optimal glucose control but not to lipid control. This research provides an example of a useful application of GIS analyses applied to large data sets now available in electronic medical records.
Authors: Jaime E Mirowsky; Robert B Devlin; David Diaz-Sanchez; Wayne Cascio; Shannon C Grabich; Carol Haynes; Colette Blach; Elizabeth R Hauser; Svati Shah; William Kraus; Kenneth Olden; Lucas Neas Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Heather F de Vries McClintock; Douglas J Wiebe; Alison J OʼDonnell; Knashawn H Morales; Dylan S Small; Hillary R Bogner Journal: Fam Community Health Date: 2015 Apr-Jun
Authors: Abhik Roy; Shilpa Mehra; Ciarán P Kelly; Sohaib Tariq; Kumar Pallav; Melinda Dennis; Ann Peer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Peter H R Green; Daniel A Leffler Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Robert S Levine; George Rust; Muktar Aliyu; Maria Pisu; Roger Zoorob; Irwin Goldzweig; Paul Juarez; Baqar Husaini; Charles H Hennekens Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Yvette C Cozier; Michelle A Albert; Nelsy Castro-Webb; Patricia F Coogan; Paul Ridker; Harvey W Kaufman; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.671