Literature DB >> 20051053

Exploring opinions and beliefs about cord blood donation among Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women.

Dianne Rucinski1, Risé Jones, Brenda Reyes, Lawon Tidwell, RoiAnn Phillips, Denise Delves.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite higher birth rates among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics, the availability of umbilical cord blood from these groups is lower due to lower donation rates than that of non-Hispanic whites. Similar racial and ethnic disparities in donation rates have been found for blood and organ donation. This study is among the first to explore beliefs and attitudes toward umbilical cord blood donation among Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five focus groups composed of Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women were conducted to explore how women conceptualize information needs about umbilical cord blood donation and from whom women want to receive information about donation. Participants were adult women who had given birth within the past year or were pregnant.
RESULTS: Lack of basic information regarding umbilical cord blood, its harvesting and use, and the steps and conditions necessary to donate were primary barriers to donation. Women expressed confusion over the differences between "donation" and "banking." The social value of donation was explicitly weighed in terms of the cost of the donation effort. Doctors were viewed as critical sources for information about donation, although women expressed skepticism about doctors' ability to convey sufficient information during short office visits.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase donation rates among Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women should include information about both the technical aspects and the social value of donation. The specific terms "umbilical" and "donation" should be used consistently to prevent misunderstanding. Information should be provided by physicians with follow-up by other health providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20051053     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

1.  Establishing a public umbilical cord blood stem cell bank for South Africa: an enquiry into public acceptability.

Authors:  Madelein Meissner-Roloff; Michael S Pepper
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Health Professionals' knowledge and attitude towards the Umbilical Cord Blood donation in Greece.

Authors:  H Hatzistilli; O Zissimopoulou; P Galanis; O Siskou; P Prezerakos; A Zissimopoulos; D Kaitelidou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Knowledge and attitudes towards stem cells and the significance of their medical application among healthcare sciences students of Jouf University.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Almaeen; Farooq Ahmed Wani; Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Stem cell preservation for regenerative therapies: ethical and governance considerations for the health care sector.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Aidan P Crowley; Cambray Smith; Dennis Wigle; Andre Terzic; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 5.  Health care professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to umbilical cord blood banking and donation: an integrative review.

Authors:  Lisa Peberdy; Jeanine Young; Lauren Kearney
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Parents' knowledge, awareness and attitudes of cord blood donation and banking options: an integrative review.

Authors:  Lisa Peberdy; Jeanine Young; Debbie Louise Massey; Lauren Kearney
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.