Literature DB >> 20050746

Young people's esthetic perception of dental midline deviation.

Yi-Fan Zhang1, Li Xiao, Juan Li, Yi-Ran Peng, Zhihe Zhao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that young people's esthetic perception of dentition midline deviation or the threshold below which they find the deviation "acceptable" depends on the gender and face type of the person with the deviation and the gender of the evaluator.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Facial images of six young subjects with three different face types were captured, and their dentition midlines were altered digitally. The images were evaluated by young people with no dental training. Statistical analysis was carried out to determine the threshold for acceptable dentition midline deviation and factors influencing perception.
RESULTS: The mean value for the threshold below which a deviation was judged "acceptable" was 2.403 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.315-2.491). The preferences of evaluators did not significantly depend on the direction of the deviation. Both male and female evaluators were significantly less tolerant of deviation in female subjects than in male subjects. However, female evaluators were significantly more tolerant of midline deviations in male subjects than were male evaluators. In addition, the same degree of deviation was most noticeable in male subjects with a tapered face type and least noticeable in female subjects with a square face type.
CONCLUSIONS: The gender and face type of an individual with dentition midline deviation and the gender of the evaluator do affect young people's esthetic perception of a dentition midline deviation and the threshold below which they find the deviation "acceptable."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20050746      PMCID: PMC8985724          DOI: 10.2319/052209-286.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  A feature-based model of symmetry detection.

Authors:  Renata Scognamillo; Gillian Rhodes; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.

Authors:  Sérgio Pinho; Carolina Ciriaco; Jorge Faber; Marcos A Lenza
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-12-22

Review 4.  Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning--Part II.

Authors:  G W Arnett; R T Bergman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.

Authors:  S E Bishara; P S Burkey; J G Kharouf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Treatment strategies for midline discrepancies.

Authors:  R Nanda; M J Margolis
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 0.970

7.  The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings.

Authors:  C D Johnston; D J Burden; M R Stevenson
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of dental midline position.

Authors:  J W Beyer; S J Lindauer
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.970

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Diastema closure using direct bonding restorations combined with orthodontic treatment: a case report.

Authors:  Soon-Kong Hwang; Jung-Hong Ha; Myoung-Uk Jin; Sung-Kyo Kim; Young-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2012-08-29

2.  Pubertal status of children and adolescents during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; K-F Krey; C Hirsch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons.

Authors:  Jamille Barros Ferreira; Licínio Esmeraldo da Silva; Márcia Tereza de Oliveira Caetano; Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

4.  Evaluation of the maxillary midline, curve of the upper lip, smile line and tooth shape: a prospective study of 140 Caucasian patients.

Authors:  María Melo; Javier Ata-Ali; Fadi Ata-Ali; Marco Bulsei; Perluigi Grella; Teresa Cobo; José María Martínez-González
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  An objective system for appraising clear aligner treatment difficulty: clear aligner treatment complexity assessment tool (CAT-CAT).

Authors:  Hu Long; Zhouqiang Wu; Xinyu Yan; Qingxuan Wang; Lu Liu; Yan Wang; Fan Jian; Lina Liao; Xiaolong Li; Wenli Lai
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Aesthetic evaluation of the labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors by orthodontists and laypersons.

Authors:  Xue Jiang; Zhiwei Cao; Yang Yao; Zhihe Zhao; Wen Liao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Acceptable deviation of labial tubercle and anterior tooth midlines relative to facial midline in smile aesthetics: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Xiuhong Wang; Jinlie Long; Mei Mei; Jin Huang; Yuan Chen; Yuanzhong Zhou; Jiangtao Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.