Literature DB >> 20050717

Amisulpride versus olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in Indian patients: randomized controlled trial.

Subhrojyoti Bhowmick1, Avijit Hazra, Malati Ghosh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly drugs of first choice in schizophrenia. Amisulpride, a new atypical antipsychotic, is reported to be effective for both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in Western countries but Indian experience is limited. The aim of the present study was therefore to conduct a trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in Indian schizophrenia patients.
METHODS: Eighty adult patients of either sex were randomized to receive standard doses of the two drugs orally, in a single blind manner, for 12 weeks, with follow up at 4 and 8 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and physician-administered Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
RESULTS: Evaluable were 39 patients on amisulpride and 38 on olanzapine. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to demographics, illness duration and rating scores. Final BPRS score was lower for olanzapine (33.2 +/- 9.44) than for amisulpride (37.7 +/- 9.67). SAPS and SANS scores and CGI rating improved individually in both arms but remained comparable between groups throughout the study period, but olanzapine reduced SAPS score to a greater extent. ADRs were encountered in 67.5% and 47.5% of patients (p = 0.113) on amisulpride and olanzapine, respectively. Tremor and insomnia were more frequent with amisulpride, while olanzapine caused more weight gain and sedation. No serious ADRs occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride, although comparable to olanzapine on some measures, did not match the improvement seen with the latter drug in BPRS and SAPS scores. Despite differences in ADR profiles, overall tolerability was satisfactory for both drugs. In Indian patients, amisulpride should therefore be an alternative to olanzapine to a limited extent, such as when weight gain and sedation are undesirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20050717     DOI: 10.3109/00048670903487134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Literature Review of the Methods Used to Compare Newer Second-Generation Agents for the Management of Schizophrenia: A focus on Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Gregory Kruse; Bruce J O Wong; Mei Sheng Duh; Patrick Lefebvre; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; John M Fastenau
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Comparing tolerability of olanzapine in schizophrenia and affective disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hoda Moteshafi; Simon Zhornitsky; Sarah Brunelle; Emmanuel Stip
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Amisulpride versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katja Komossa; Christine Rummel-Kluge; Heike Hunger; Franziska Schmid; Sandra Schwarz; Joaquim I Silveira da Mota Neto; Werner Kissling; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 4.  Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sarah Je Barry; Tracey M Gaughan; Robert Hunter
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-06-28

5.  Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten Bak; Annemarie Fransen; Jouke Janssen; Jim van Os; Marjan Drukker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparative efficacy and safety between amisulpride and olanzapine in schizophrenia treatment and a cost analysis in China: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Peng Men; Zhanmiao Yi; Chaoyun Li; Shuli Qu; Tengbin Xiong; Xin Yu; Suodi Zhai
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.