Literature DB >> 20050202

SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: guidelines for the management of vasa previa.

Robert Gagnon, Lucie Morin, Stephen Bly, Kimberly Butt, Yvonne M Cargil, Nanette Denis, Marja Anne Hietala-Coyle, Kenneth Ian Lim, Annie Ouellet, Maria-Hélène Racicot, Shia Salem, Lynda Hudon, Melanie Basso, Hayley Bos, Marie-France Delisle, Dan Farine, Kirsten Grabowska, Savas Menticoglou, William Mundle, Lynn Murphy-Kaulbeck, Annie Ouellet, Tracy Pressey, Anne Roggensack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the etiology of vasa previa and the risk factors and associated condition, to identify the various clinical presentations of vasa previa, to describe the ultrasound tools used in its diagnosis, and to describe the management of vasa previa. OUTCOMES: Reduction of perinatal mortality, short-term neonatal morbidity, long-term infant morbidity, and short-term and long-term maternal morbidity and mortality. EVIDENCE: Published literature on randomized trials prospective cohort studies, and selected retrospective cohort studies was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., selected epidemiological studies comparing delivery by Caesarean section with vaginal delivery studies comparing outcomes when vasa previa is diagnosed antenatally vs.intrapartum) and key words (e.g. vasa previa). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated into the guideline to October 1, 2008. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies,clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and from national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The evidence collected was reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee and the Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and quantified using the evaluation of evidence guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefit expected from this guideline is facilitation of optimal and uniform care for pregnancies complicated by vasa previa. SPONSORS: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20050202     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord.

Authors:  S Bosselmann; G Mielke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  A case of vasa previa diagnosed prenatally, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Atsushi Komatsu; Shiro Kozuma; Shiro Yoshida; Hironobu Hyodo; Takahiro Yamashita; Yoshimasa Kamei; Tomoyuki Fujii; Yuji Taketani
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Clinically Relevant Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Umbilical Cord Pathology.

Authors:  Roxana Elena Bohîlțea; Vlad Dima; Ioniță Ducu; Ana Maria Iordache; Bianca Margareta Mihai; Octavian Munteanu; Corina Grigoriu; Alina Veduță; Dimitrie Pelinescu-Onciul; Radu Vlădăreanu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

4.  Indefinite Fetal Heart Rate Pattern in a Patient with Vasa Previa: A Situation Where Guideline Is Inapplicable.

Authors:  Yan-Zhen Zhang; Wen-Chao Sun; Zhi-Hua Wang; Zhi-Fen Zhang
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Clinical value of color doppler ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord entry abnormity.

Authors:  Jiandong Sun; Li Wang; Yinghui Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.