| Literature DB >> 20049651 |
Gavish Kumar1, Pradeep Kumar Dagur, Prashant Kumar Singh, Hari Shankar, Virendra S Yadav, Vishwa M Katoch, Bharat Bajaj, Rajesh Gupta, Utpal Sengupta, Beenu Joshi.
Abstract
Elimination of tuberculosis (TB) largely depends upon definitive rapid diagnosis and treatment. Widely used diagnostic tests do not qualify for use in a developing country due to lack of either desired accuracy or their cost. In the present study an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to evaluate the diagnostic potential of an immuno-dominant 30/32-kDa mycolyl transferase complex (Ag85 complex) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific proteins (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) of the RD1 region. Higher sensitivity (84.1%) with Ag85 complex was observed compared with ESAT-6 (64.9%) and CFP-10 (66%), with almost similar specificity (Ag85: 85.2%, ESAT-6: 88.9%, CFP-10: 85.2%), whereas the individual components of Ag85 complex, i.e. Ag85A, Ag85B, and Ag85C, showed sensitivities of 44.6, 34, and 80.9% and specificities of 55.6, 74.1, and 40.7% respectively. A cocktail of Ag85 complex, ESAT-6, CFP-10, Ag85A, Ag85B, and Ag85C antigens also could not help in increasing either sensitivity (51.1%) or specificity (85.2%). Furthermore, immunoblot analysis using clinical isolates as well as a standard strain (H37Rv) of M. tuberculosis also showed strong reactivity of sera from TB patients to Ag85 complex and, to a lesser extent, also to ESAT-6. To conclude, use of Ag85 complex along with ESAT-6 and CFP-10 seems to be promising in minimizing the heterogeneous sero-responses of adult TB cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20049651 PMCID: PMC2816261 DOI: 10.1007/s00005-009-0055-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) ISSN: 0004-069X Impact factor: 4.291
Details of different groups of patient with tuberculosis and control subjects studied in this study
| Study subjects | Total No | Sex | Mean age | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Year | Range | ||
| 1. Tuberculosis | 86 | 53 | 33 | ||
| i. Pulmonary cases | 48 | 32 | 16 | 32.6 ± 13.2 | 18–65 |
| ii. Extra-pulmonary cases | 10 | 3 | 7 | 31.0 ± 14.0 | 18–65 |
| iii. Defaulter TB cases | 20 | 10 | 10 | 28.7 ± 8.8 | 18–50 |
| iv. Relapse TB cases | 8 | 8 | 0 | 32.0 ± 10.8 | 24–55 |
| 2. Healthy controls | 29 | 21 | 8 | 25.9 ± 6.7 | 22–52 |
| 3. Leprosy controls | 18 | 12 | 6 | 33.3 ± 6.8 | 25–60 |
| 4. Anti tuberculosis treated cases | 10 | 8 | 2 | 35.3 ± 12.8 | 18–58 |
Immunoglobulin G reactivity against various secretory antigens of M. tuberculosis at cut off decided by ROC analysis
| Antigen | Cutoff | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | +PV (%) | −PV (%) | +LR | −LR | ROC area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAT-6 | 0.331 | 64.9 | 88.9 | 95.3 | 42.1 | 5.84 | 0.39 | 0.743 |
| CFP-10 | 0.293 | 66.0 | 85.2 | 93.9 | 41.8 | 4.45 | 0.40 | 0.746 |
| Ag85 complex | 0.150 | 84.1 | 85.2 | 95.2 | 60.5 | 5.67 | 0.19 | 0.879 |
| Ag85A | 0.119 | 44.6 | 55.6 | 77.4 | 23.2 | 1.01 | 0.10 | 0.496 |
| Ag85B | 0.163 | 34.0 | 74.1 | 82.8 | 24.4 | 1.31 | 0.89 | 0.545 |
| Ag85C | 0.072 | 80.9 | 40.7 | 82.6 | 37.9 | 1.36 | 0.47 | 0.603 |
| Cocktail | 0.114 | 51.1 | 85.2 | 92.3 | 33.3 | 3.45 | 0.57 | 0.685 |
Correlation of antibody reactivity of various secretory antigens
| ESAT-6–CFP-10+/Total patients | CFP-10–ESAT-6+/Total patients | Ag85–ESAT-6+/Total patients | Ag85–CFP-10+/Total patients | Ag85–Ag85A+/Total patients | Ag85–Ag85B+/Total patients | Ag85–Ag85C+/Total patients | Ag85–Cocktail+/Total patients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7/76 | 7/76 | 1/76 | Nil/76 | 5/76 | 4/76 | 7/76 | 4/76 |
Fig. 1Antibody reactivity to various secretory antigens of M. tuberculosis with sera derived from different clinical groups (FTB: fresh untreated, DTB: defaulters, RTB: relapsed, EPTB: extra-pulmonary TB) of tuberculosis patients and controls (HC: healthy controls, LP: leprosy patients). TtTB denotes the treated cases of tuberculosis. Each scatter represents a tested sample of serum, the dotted line denotes the cutoff decided by ROC
Fig. 2Area under ROC of three significant antigens with sera from tuberculosis patients
Fig. 3Lanes 1–5 of whole-cell extracts (WCEs) of clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis. a, b Blotting with BCG-vaccinated healthy individual’s sera. c–d Reactivity with individual tuberculosis patient’s sera. e Reactivity pattern of contact with tuberculosis. f 12% SDS–PAGE gel pattern of WCEs of clinical isolates and H37Rv. g Hybridization of polyclonal antibody against ESAT-6 and CFP-10 with whole-cell extracts. h Hybridization of monoclonal antibody (CS-90) against Ag85 complex with WCEs of clinical isolates and H37Rv. Rv: M. tuberculosis laboratory reference strain H37Rv; arrow shows the reactivity pattern of Ag85 complex