Literature DB >> 20049641

p53 as a marker of prognosis in African-American women with breast cancer.

Keith A Dookeran1, James J Dignam, Karen Ferrer, Marin Sekosan, Worta McCaskill-Stevens, Sarah Gehlert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: p53 overexpression has been identified as a poor prognostic marker in breast cancer. We investigate the value of p53 status within the context of stage and intrinsic subtype classification (subtype), in a group of African-American (AA) women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with primary breast cancer.
METHODS: Participants were 331 consecutive AA women treated at an urban hospital (median follow-up 41 months) with known subtype [luminal A = estrogen receptor (ER)+ and/or progesterone receptor (PR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-; luminal B = ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+; HER2+ = ER-, PR-, HER2+; basal = ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin (CK)5/6+, and/or HER1+; and unclassified = negative for all five markers] and p53 (Pab1801 antibody) immunohistochemical status. Proportional hazards regression models were used to select and evaluate factors prognostic for all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: p53+ status was associated with grade 3 tumors, ER/PR- status, and basal subtype. On univariate analysis, factors related to survival were stage, grade [(3/1) hazard ratio (HR) = 2.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-6.07], subtype [(ex. basal/luminal A) HR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.34-3.45], and p53 status [(+/-) HR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.15-2.72]. Multivariable modeling indicated that p53+ status remained a negative prognostic factor (HR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.59) after adjustment for effects of age, stage, grade, and subtype; 5-year adjusted survival was significantly greater for p53- (66.7%) than p53+ cases (54.7%).
CONCLUSION: p53 status is an independent predictor of survival after consideration of other strong prognostic factors such as stage, tumor grade, and subtype, and thus may be useful in identifying AA women at high risk of breast cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20049641     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0889-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  27 in total

1.  Metaplastic Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in 2500 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Oncology Database.

Authors:  Cecilia T Ong; Brittany M Campbell; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Jeremy Force; Allison Hall; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Expression of WTH3 in breast cancer tissue and the effects on the biological behavior of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lin Gan; Guoqing Zuo; Ting Wang; Jie Min; Yadong Wang; Yongyue Wang; Gang Lv
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Clinical efficacy of administering oxaliplatin combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yang Xiao; Wei Wei; Jian-Xiong Guo; Yang-Chen Liu; Xiao-Hong Huang; Rong-Xia Zhang; Yi-Jia Wu; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Racial disparities, cancer and response to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Zhi-Wei Ye; Danyelle M Townsend; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Kenneth D Tew
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.242

5.  Co-expression of p16 and p53 characterizes aggressive subtypes of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Charles Bechert; Jee-Yeon Kim; Trine Tramm; Fattaneh A Tavassoli
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Race and the prognostic influence of p53 in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Keith A Dookeran; James J Dignam; Nathaniel Holloway; Karen Ferrer; Marin Sekosan; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Significance of immunohistochemistry in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dana Carmen Zaha
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

8.  Associations between sociodemographic and clinicopathological factors and breast cancer subtypes in a population-based study.

Authors:  Adana A M Llanos; Sheenu Chandwani; Elisa V Bandera; Kim M Hirshfield; Yong Lin; Christine B Ambrosone; Kitaw Demissie
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Estrogen receptor-alpha promoter methylation in sporadic basal-like breast cancer of Chinese women.

Authors:  Ming-xi Jing; Xiao-yun Mao; Chao Li; Jing Wei; Chong Liu; Feng Jin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-04-06

Review 10.  Emerging evidence for the role of differential tumor microenvironment in breast cancer racial disparity: a closer look at the surroundings.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar Deshmukh; Sanjeev K Srivastava; Nikhil Tyagi; Aamir Ahmad; Ajay P Singh; Ahmed A L Ghadhban; Donna L Dyess; James E Carter; Kari Dugger; Seema Singh
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.