Literature DB >> 20049536

Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in hypertensive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Rungroj Krittayaphong1, Thananya Boonyasirinant, Vithaya Chaithiraphan, Adisak Maneesai, Pairash Saiviroonporn, Supaporn Nakyen, Prajak Thanapiboonpol, Ahthit Yindeengam, Suthipol Udompanturak.   

Abstract

To determine the prognosis of a myocardial scar assessed by a late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in hypertensive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with systemic hypertension with known or suspected CAD without a clinical history of myocardial infarction were enrolled. All patients underwent CMR for assessment of cardiac function and LGE. Prognostic data was determined by the occurrence of a hard cardiac endpoint, defined as cardiac death or a non-fatal myocardial infarction, or major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death, a non-fatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization due to heart failure, unstable angina, or life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. A total of 1,644 patients were enrolled; 48% were males and the mean age was 65 +/- 11 years. The average follow-up time was 863 +/- 559 days. Four hundred fifty-three (28%) patients had LGE. LGE was the strongest and most independent predictor for hard events and MACEs with hazard ratios of 4.77 and 3.38, respectively. Other independent predictors of hard events and MACEs were left ventricular ejection fraction and mass, the use of a beta-blocker, and a history of heart failure. The risk of cardiac events increased as the extent of LGE increased; the hazard ratio was 12.74 for hard events for those with a LGE >20% of the myocardium. LGE is the most important and independent predictor for cardiac events in hypertensive patients with known or suspected CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20049536     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9574-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  25 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tareq Ibrahim; Hubertus P Bülow; Thomas Hackl; Mira Hörnke; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin Breuer; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Accuracy of visual assessment in the detection and quantification of myocardial scar by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Krittayaphong; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Thananya Boonyasirinant; Supaporn Nakyen; Prajak Thanapiboonpol; Suthipol Udompunturak
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2007-11

Review 4.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  The relationship between resting systolic blood pressure and cutaneous pain perception in cardiac patients with angina pectoris and controls.

Authors:  D Sheffield; R Krittayaphong; B M Go; C G Christy; P L Biles; D S Sheps
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  James C C Moon; Diego Perez De Arenaza; Andrew G Elkington; Anil K Taneja; Anna S John; Duolao Wang; Rajesh Janardhanan; Roxy Senior; Avijit Lahiri; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Alain Cohen-Solal; Gerasimos Filippatos; John J V McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Anna Strömberg; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Dan Atar; Arno W Hoes; Andre Keren; Alexandre Mebazaa; Markku Nieminen; Silvia Giuliana Priori; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  K K Ho; J L Pinsky; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Incidence and prognostic implication of unrecognized myocardial scar characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance in diabetic patients without clinical evidence of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Raymond Y Kwong; Hamid Sattar; Henry Wu; Gabriel Vorobiof; Vijay Gandla; Kevin Steel; Samuel Siu; Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Sverker Jern; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Markku S Nieminen; Steven Snapinn; Katherine E Harris; Peter Aurup; Jonathan M Edelman; Hans Wedel; Lars H Lindholm; Björn Dahlöf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prognostic Implications of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion in Patients with Hypertension and a Clinical Indication for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Richard B Devereux; Pablo Salazar; Michael Trybula; Richard C Chia; Kaleigh Evans; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-11-05

2.  Left ventricular ejection fraction and presence of myocardial necrosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correctly risk stratify patients with stable coronary artery disease: a multi-center all-comers trial.

Authors:  Dominik Buckert; Sebastian Kelle; Sebastian Buss; Grigorios Korosoglou; Rolf Gebker; Ralf Birkemeyer; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Hugo Katus; Burkert Pieske; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Prognostic value of unrecognised myocardial infarction detected by late gadolinium-enhanced MRI in diabetic patients with normal global and regional left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Yeonyee E Yoon; Kakuya Kitagawa; Shingo Kato; Hiroshi Nakajima; Tairo Kurita; Kaoru Dohi; Masaaki Ito; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiac MRI: a central prognostic tool in myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; João A C Lima
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Subclinical Myocardial Disease in Heart Failure Detected by CMR.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ohyama; Gustavo J Volpe; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Nathan Mewton; Chia Ying Liu; Pierre Croisille; David Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Late gadolinium enhancement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance is complementary to left ventricle ejection fraction in predicting prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Oronzo Catalano; Guido Moro; Mariarosa Perotti; Mauro Frascaroli; Monica Ceresa; Serena Antonaci; Paola Baiardi; Carlo Napolitano; Maurizia Baldi; Silvia G Priori
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Cardiovascular imaging 2010 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan de Sutter; Nico R L van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension.

Authors:  Alicia M Maceira; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  The Utility of Circulating and Imaging Biomarkers Alone and in Combination in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Biyanka Jaltotage; Girish Dwivedi; Daryl Eng Lee Ooi; Gnanadevan Mahadavan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.