Literature DB >> 2004942

Pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a final report of the 1973 and 1978 patterns of care studies.

R M Lanciano1, M Won, L R Coia, G E Hanks.   

Abstract

The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) conducted two national surveys of patients treated in 1973 and 1978 for squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix. In addition, a survey of patients treated in 1973 from selected large facilities was conducted to establish outcome with "optimal" radiotherapy. The large facility survey consistently reported improved outcome compared to both national average surveys when analyzed by stage and other significant pretreatment factors. That improved outcome was associated with the paracentral (PCS point A) dose and the use of intracavitary irradiation. In this study, we report the pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix by analysis of the 1973 and 1978 PCS data. Pretreatment factors associated with improved pelvic control in multivariate analysis include higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (Stage I and II), older age (Stage I and II), unilateral parametrial involvement (Stage IIB), and unilateral sidewall involvement (Stage III). The only treatment factor associated with improved pelvic control in multivariate analysis is the use of intracavitary irradiation. However, a dose response for infield pelvic control was demonstrated only in Stage III cervix cancer with the highest rate of pelvic control with paracentral (PCS point A) dose greater than 8500 cGy. Multivariate analysis revealed that unilateral parametrial involvement for Stage IIB and unilateral sidewall involvement for Stage III are significant positive prognostic factors with respect to survival after treatment with radiotherapy. No FIGO substage significantly affected survival after radiotherapy. Although FIGO staging is the single most important pretreatment prognostic factor with respect to survival and infield pelvic failure, FIGO substaging deserves reappraisal and further refinement. Major complications were seen in only 9.5% of patients treated with radiotherapy and were stage but not survey related. There is a significant relationship between PCS point A dose and complications with the highest rate of complications for PCS point A dose greater than 8500 cGy. A significant relationship between lateral (external iliac lymph nodes or PCS point P) dose and major complications is also found, and doses greater than 5000 cGy are associated with a significant increase in complications. The PCS has established two sequential national benchmarks of treatment outcome for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy with respect to survival, infield pelvic control, and complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2004942     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90007-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  56 in total

1.  Radical radiotherapy for locally advanced cancer of uterine cervix.

Authors:  Jeung Eun Lee; Seung Jae Huh; Won Park; Do Hoon Lim; Yong Chan Ahn; Chang Soo Park; Byoung Gie Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Je Ho Lee; Chong Taik Park; Tae Jin Kim; Kyung Taek Lim; Hwan Wook Chung; Ki Heon Lee; Jae Uk Shim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Which clinical/pathologic factors matter in the era of chemoradiation as treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Analysis of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Chunqiao Tian; Peter G Rose; Rachelle Lanciano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Prospective randomized study comparing concomitant chemoradiotherapy using weekly cisplatin & paclitaxel versus weekly cisplatin in locally advanced carcinoma cervix.

Authors:  Pragyat Thakur; Rajeev Seam; Manoj Gupta; Manish Gupta
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

4.  Can point doses predict volumetric dose to rectum and bladder: a CT-based planning study in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma?

Authors:  V M Patil; F D Patel; S Chakraborty; A S Oinam; S C Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  A review of recent developments in image-guided radiation therapy in cervix cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Akila N Viswanathan; Sushil Beriwal; Jennifer F De Los Santos; D Jeffrey Demanes; David Gaffney; Jorgen Hansen; Ellen Jones; Christian Kirisits; Bruce Thomadsen; Beth Erickson
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Authors:  Zhongshan Liu; Yangzhi Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Jing Sun; Xia Lin; Tiejun Wang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  The quality of cervical cancer brachytherapy implantation and the impact on local recurrence and disease-free survival in radiation therapy oncology group prospective trials 0116 and 0128.

Authors:  Akila N Viswanathan; Jennifer Moughan; William Small; Charles Levenback; Revathy Iyer; Sharon Hymes; Adam P Dicker; Brigitte Miller; Beth Erickson; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer: Results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Atri; Zheng Zhang; Farrokh Dehdashti; Susanna I Lee; Shamshad Ali; Helga Marques; Wui-Jin Koh; Kathleen Moore; Lisa Landrum; Jae Weon Kim; Paul DiSilvestro; Eric Eisenhauer; Frederick Schnell; Michael Gold
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  John A Vargo; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.