| Literature DB >> 20049243 |
Abstract
The natural environment factor is one of the main indexes for evaluating human habitats, sustained economic growth and ecological health status. Based on Geographic Information System (GIS) technology and an analytic hierarchy process method, this article presents the construction of the Natural Environment Suitability Index (NESI) model of China by using natural environment data including climate, hydrology, surface configuration and ecological conditions. The NESI value is calculated in grids of 1 km by 1 km through ArcGIS. The spatial regularity of NESI is analyzed according to its spatial distribution and proportional structure. The relationship of NESI with population distribution and economic growth is also discussed by analyzing NESI results with population distribution data and GDP data in 1 km by 1 km grids. The study shows that: (1) the value of NESI is higher in the East and lower in the West in China; The best natural environment area is the Yangtze River Delta region and the worst are the northwest of Tibet and southwest of Xinjiang. (2) There is a close correlation among natural environment, population distribution and economic growth; the best natural environment area, the Yangtze River Delta region, is also the region with higher population density and richer economy. The worst natural environment areas, Northwest and Tibetan Plateau, are also regions with lower population density and poorer economies.Entities:
Keywords: GDP; GIS; NESI; natural environment; population; spatial distribution
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20049243 PMCID: PMC2800331 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph6123025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Main factors and parameters for natural environment evaluation.
| Factors | Parameters | Scale | Time | Data sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 weather & climate | 1.1 accumulated temperature | 1 km | ||
| 1.2 hours of sunshine | 1 km | annual average of 1981–2005 | RESDC | |
| 1.3 humidity index | 1 km | |||
| 2 hydrology | 2.1 annual precipitation | 1 km | ||
| 2.2 drainage density | 1:100,000 | 2005 | RESDC/CAS | |
| 3 topography | 3.1 elevation (m) | 1:2,500,000 | 2000 | |
| 3.2 slope | 1:2,500,000 | 2000 | SBSC | |
| 3.3 feature type | 1:40,000,000 | 2000 | ||
| 4 ground vegetation | 4.1 net primary production (NPP) | 1 km | 2005 | RESDC/CAS |
The evaluated indexes system and weight coefficients of the environmental background.
| Level-1 index | Level-2 index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Index | Weight | Index | Weight |
| 1 Climate condition | 0.20 | 1.1 Accumulated temperature | 0.50 |
| 1.2 Hours of sunshine (h) | 0.15 | ||
| 1.3 Wetness index | 0.35 | ||
| 2 Hydrology condition | 0.31 | 2.1 Precipitation (mm) | 0.65 |
| 2.2 River density | 0.35 | ||
| 3 Topography condition | 0.37 | 3.1 Elevation (m) | 0.25 |
| 3.2 Slope (°) | 0.40 | ||
| 3.3 Feature types | 0.35 | ||
| 4 Ecology condition | 0.12 | 4.1 NPP (g/m2.y) | 1 |
Data standardization.
| Factors | Parameters | Standardized relative value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | ||
| 1 Climate condition | 1.1 Accumulated temperature (>0°C) | <500 | 500–1k | 1k–2k | 2k–5k | 5k–7k | >7k |
| 1.2 Hours of sunshine | <1 | 1–2 | 2–3 | 3–4 | 4–5 | >5 | |
| 1.3 Wetness index | <0.05 | 0.05–0.15 | 0.15–0.3 | 0.3–0.45 | 0.45–0.65 | >0.65 | |
| 2 Hydrology condition | 2.1 Precipitation | <100 | 100–200 | 200–400 | 400–800 | 800–1000 | >1000 |
| 2.2 River density | <10 | 10~30 | 30–60 | 60–100 | 100–150 | >150 | |
| 3 Topography condition | 3.1 Elevation | >25 | 15–25 | 8–15 | 5–8 | 2–5 | <2 |
| 3.2 Slope | >5k | 2k–5k | 1k–2k | 500–1k | 200–500 | <200 | |
| 3.3 Feature types | Sand hill, glacier | Abrupt mountain | plateau | Hills | mesa | plain and all others types | |
| 4 Ecology condition | 4.1 NPP | <50 | 50–100 | 100–200 | 200–400 | 400–700 | >700 |
Figure 1.Population Density Distribution of China in 2003.
Figure 2.GDP Density Distribution of China in 2003.
Figure 3.Distribution of NESI.
Area, population and GDP statistics based on the natural environment suitability of China.
| NESI Grade | Land | Population | GDP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (104 km2) | Percent (%) | Number (million people) | Percent (%) | Population Density (People/ km2) | Value (108 RMB) | Percent (%) | GDP Density (104 RMB/ km2) | |
| 5th | 201.42 | 21.37 | 2.27 | 0.18 | 1 | 63.82 | 0.08 | 0.32 |
| 4th | 408.50 | 43.34 | 161.76 | 12.59 | 40 | 5831.44 | 7.56 | 14.30 |
| 3rd | 192.65 | 20.44 | 406.95 | 31.67 | 211 | 22679.80 | 29.39 | 118.46 |
| 2nd | 112.25 | 11.91 | 518.66 | 40.36 | 462 | 30037.80 | 38.93 | 269.58 |
| 1st | 27.62 | 2.93 | 195.40 | 15.21 | 707 | 18544.30 | 24.03 | 689.26 |
The distribution of population density and natural environment.
| Population density (People/ km2) | The area percent of various natural environment | The percent of total (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th grade | 4th grade | 3rd grade | 2nd grade | 1st grade | Area | Population | |
| 0–10 | 31.96 | 11.36 | 3.43 | 0.57 | 66.54 | 0.12 | |
| 10–50 | 0.36 | 39.59 | 15.43 | 1.91 | 6.50 | 1.369 | |
| 50–100 | 0.42 | 35.87 | 17.98 | 2.93 | 5.21 | 2.788 | |
| 100–500 | 0.34 | 19.94 | 29.44 | 8.67 | 15.20 | 28.078 | |
| 500–1000 | 0.13 | 8.84 | 27.15 | 13.16 | 4.78 | 23.773 | |
| 1000–5000 | 0.13 | 11.47 | 24.47 | 17.80 | 1.47 | 18.929 | |
| 5000–10000 | 0.17 | 9.41 | 32.40 | 20.92 | 0.18 | 9.248 | |
| >10000 | 0.00 | 7.48 | 33.05 | 20.77 | 0.13 | 15.703 | |
Note: The number in bold type denotes the largest proportion of NESI grade in each level of population density.
The distribution of GDP density and natural environment.
| GDP density (104 RMB/ km2) | The area percent of various natural environment | The percent of total (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th grade | 4th grade | 3rd grade | 2nd grade | 1st grade | Area | GDP | |
| 0–10 | 28.83 | 14.84 | 3.87 | 0.35 | 74.11 | 0.99 | |
| 10–100 | 0.36 | 22.33 | 30.41 | 7.17 | 17.35 | 6.97 | |
| 100–1000 | 0.09 | 11.69 | 29.52 | 14.36 | 7.23 | 26.56 | |
| 1000–10000 | 0.08 | 7.18 | 26.88 | 24.31 | 1.07 | 26.24 | |
| >10000 | 0.04 | 5.0 | 30.83 | 29.27 | 0.24 | 39.24 | |
The province sequence according to the NESI of China (Not including Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao).
| Province | ranking | NESI | Population density pople/ Km2 | GDP density 104 RBM/ Km2 | Province | ranking | NESI | Population density pople/ Km2 | GDP density 104RBM/Km2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | 1 | 83.13 | 3875 | 9923.10 | Liaoning | 17 | 60.5 | 280 | 261.09 |
| Jiangsu | 2 | 79.07 | 1076 | 1220.13 | Heilongjiang | 18 | 60.02 | 84 | 96.24 |
| Hainan | 3 | 78.69 | 184 | 205.43 | Jilin | 19 | 59.82 | 176 | 160.54 |
| Anhui | 4 | 76.24 | 454 | 260.80 | Beijing | 20 | 57.93 | 843 | 2180.64 |
| Guangdong | 5 | 75.58 | 427 | 871.37 | Hebei | 21 | 57.36 | 338 | 391.97 |
| Jiangxi | 6 | 73.11 | 239 | 153.46 | Yunnan | 22 | 56.47 | 97 | 53.31 |
| Guangxi | 7 | 72.09 | 193 | 113.35 | Sichuan | 23 | 49.8 | 169 | 117.51 |
| Zhejiang | 8 | 71.7 | 435 | 984.61 | Shanxi | 24 | 49.79 | 166 | 166.45 |
| Hunan | 9 | 71.44 | 340 | 208.23 | Shaanxi | 25 | 49.31 | 204 | 114.04 |
| Hubei | 10 | 69.44 | 311 | 294.45 | Inner Mongolia | 26 | 45.93 | 19 | 19.73 |
| Fujian | 11 | 68.52 | 244 | 451.41 | Ningxia | 27 | 43.86 | 96 | 74.87 |
| Henan | 12 | 68.36 | 590 | 401.14 | Gansu | 28 | 38.28 | 67 | 35.05 |
| Shandong | 13 | 66.27 | 607 | 833.68 | Xinjiang | 29 | 31 | 9 | 7.31 |
| Tianjin | 14 | 65.58 | 929 | 1126.77 | Qinghai | 30 | 30.25 | 6 | 4.27 |
| Chongqing | 15 | 64.14 | 333 | 261.43 | Tibet | 31 | 27.87 | 2 | 0.73 |
| Guizhou | 16 | 61.24 | 193 | 86.14 |
Figure 4.The correlation between population density and GDP in province level.