Philip M Grant1, Andrew R Zolopa. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. pmgrant@stanford.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistance testing has become an important component of the recommended care for treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients in the developed world, and their use has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Despite the widespread use of resistance testing, the clinician faces a number of challenges in optimally applying these technologies to antiretroviral management. RECENT FINDINGS: Even with the aid of a genotypic interpretation system, the interpretation of a genotype is complex and benefits from expert input. Phenotypic resistance testing is limited by cost and availability for many patients. Standard resistance testing (both genotypes and phenotypes) is unable to detect minority species. The presence of resistant minority populations has been associated with virologic failure. However, the current techniques available to detect their presence are cumbersome and not soon likely to become part of routine clinical care. The development of the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 antagonists has provided new challenges in quantifying antiretroviral resistance. SUMMARY: Resistance testing plays a central role in the management of treatment-experienced patients. Further progress in the interpretation of resistance testing, especially as new agents are developed, will continue to add value to the care of HIV-infected patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistance testing has become an important component of the recommended care for treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HIV-infectedpatients in the developed world, and their use has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Despite the widespread use of resistance testing, the clinician faces a number of challenges in optimally applying these technologies to antiretroviral management. RECENT FINDINGS: Even with the aid of a genotypic interpretation system, the interpretation of a genotype is complex and benefits from expert input. Phenotypic resistance testing is limited by cost and availability for many patients. Standard resistance testing (both genotypes and phenotypes) is unable to detect minority species. The presence of resistant minority populations has been associated with virologic failure. However, the current techniques available to detect their presence are cumbersome and not soon likely to become part of routine clinical care. The development of the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 antagonists has provided new challenges in quantifying antiretroviral resistance. SUMMARY: Resistance testing plays a central role in the management of treatment-experienced patients. Further progress in the interpretation of resistance testing, especially as new agents are developed, will continue to add value to the care of HIV-infectedpatients.
Authors: Alice Tseng; Michelle Foisy; Christine A Hughes; Deborah Kelly; Shanna Chan; Natalie Dayneka; Pierre Giguère; Niamh Higgins; Cara Hills-Nieminen; Jeff Kapler; Charles J L la Porte; Pam Nickel; Laura Park-Wyllie; Carlo Quaia; Linda Robinson; Nancy Sheehan; Shannon Stone; Linda Sulz; Deborah Yoong Journal: Can J Hosp Pharm Date: 2012-03
Authors: Jaime Soria; Marta Bull; Caroline Mitchell; Alberto La Rosa; Sandra Dross; Kelli Kraft; Robert Coombs; Eduardo Ticona; Lisa Frenkel Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jan Weber; Ana C Vazquez; Dane Winner; Justine D Rose; Doug Wylie; Ariel M Rhea; Kenneth Henry; Jennifer Pappas; Alison Wright; Nizar Mohamed; Richard Gibson; Benigno Rodriguez; Vicente Soriano; Kevin King; Eric J Arts; Paul D Olivo; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Maria C Puertas; Maria J Buzón; Mònica Ballestero; Peter Van Den Eede; Bonaventura Clotet; Julia G Prado; Javier Martinez-Picado Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Fred Kyeyune; Richard M Gibson; Immaculate Nankya; Colin Venner; Samar Metha; Juliet Akao; Emmanuel Ndashimye; Cissy M Kityo; Robert A Salata; Peter Mugyenyi; Eric J Arts; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michael A Kolber; Patricia Buendia; Victor Degruttola; Richard D Moore Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Richard M Gibson; Ashley M Meyer; Dane Winner; John Archer; Felix Feyertag; Ezequiel Ruiz-Mateos; Manuel Leal; David L Robertson; Christine L Schmotzer; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 5.191