Literature DB >> 20048621

Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis.

Jennifer L Rhodes1, John C Kolar, Jeffrey A Fearon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complex craniosynostoses, which include all nonsyndromic multiple sutural fusions, represent a small fraction of patients presenting with craniosynostosis. Among these are a trisutural fusion, dubbed the "Mercedes Benz pattern," involving the sagittal and both lambdoid sutures. The purpose of this report is to review the authors' series of this unusual form of craniosynostosis, to identify associated anomalies, and to assess treatment outcomes.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective clinical outcome assessment of all patients presenting with Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis. Growth was assessed by direct anthropologic measurements, and significance was assessed by the t test.
RESULTS: Over a 17-year period, 11 of 802 patients presenting with craniosynostosis were identified with Mercedes Benz pattern synostosis (1.4 percent). Three patients had additional sutural involvement and two had identifiable genetic syndromes. Seven of 11 (64 percent) had cerebellar tonsillar herniation on preoperative imaging, and four symptomatic patients (36 percent) have required Chiari decompressions. Three patients have required more than one remodeling procedure. Serial postoperative anthropologic measurements identified progressive brachycephaly, with diminished growth in both head circumference and skull length (mean follow-up, 3.75 years). Cognitive function was grossly normal, except for one syndromic patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite fusion of the sagittal suture, the surgical treatment for Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis should include skull lengthening, not reduction. The authors' findings for diminished postoperative growth suggest that an overcorrection be considered. Fourth or fifth sutural involvement correlated with additional corrections. Given the observed high incidence for symptomatic cerebellar tonsillar herniation, routine magnetic resonance evaluations are recommended for affected individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20048621     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a6aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Skull base development and craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Susan I Blaser; Nancy Padfield; David Chitayat; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-09-07

2.  Bilateral lambdoid and posterior sagittal craniosynostosis--management, evolution, and outcome.

Authors:  Shibu Pillai; D Cochrane; A Singhal; Paul Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Genetic advances in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Wanda Lattanzi; Marta Barba; Lorena Di Pietro; Simeon A Boyadjiev
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Craniosynostosis of the lambdoid suture.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rhodes; Gary W Tye; Jeffrey A Fearon
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Bilambdoid and sagittal synostosis: Report of 39 cases.

Authors:  Nathalie Chivoret; Eric Arnaud; Kim Giraudat; Frazer O'Brien; Leslie Pamphile; Philippe Meyer; Dominique Renier; C Collet; Federico Di Rocco
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-10-11

6.  Mercedes Benz craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Dhaval Shukla
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  A progressive and complex clinical course in two family members with ERF-related craniosynostosis: a case report.

Authors:  Izabella Körberg; Daniel Nowinski; Marie-Louise Bondeson; Malin Melin; Lars Kölby; Eva-Lena Stattin
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.103

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.