Literature DB >> 20048366

The complementarity of public and private long-term care coverage.

David G Stevenson1, Marc A Cohen, Eileen J Tell, Brian Burwell.   

Abstract

Discussions about long-term care financing often get mired in the false dichotomy that long-term care should be primarily either a public or a private responsibility. Our starting premise is that public and private long-term care coverage can best serve complementary roles. Therefore, public policy should focus on supporting both mechanisms to achieve efficient and equitable outcomes. The current state of the private long-term care insurance market, and the possible reasons for its modest size, provide a starting point for exploring how public policy might interface more productively with it, in the context of both existing and potential programs, such as the proposed Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20048366     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  2 in total

1.  Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.

Authors:  Portia Y Cornell; David C Grabowski; Marc Cohen; Xiaomei Shi; David G Stevenson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Financial social protection and individual out-of-pocket costs of long-term care in the USA and Europe: An observational study.

Authors:  Marco Angrisani; José Carlos Ortega Regalado; Tiago Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.