BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that right ventricular (RV) pressure overload affects RV function and further influences left ventricular (LV) geometry, which adversely affects LV twist mechanics and segmental function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic images were prospectively acquired in 44 patients (age, 46+/-12 years; 82% women) with evidence of pulmonary hypertension (estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure, 71+/-23 mm Hg) and in 44 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. Patients with intrinsic LV diseases were excluded. RV lateral wall longitudinal strain (LS) and interventricular septal (IVS) LS were reduced in the pulmonary hypertension group compared with control subjects (-15.9+/-7.6% versus -25.5+/-6.1%, P<0.001; and -17.3+/-4.4% versus -20.2+/-3.9%, P=0.002, respectively), whereas LV lateral wall LS was preserved. RV lateral wall LS and IVS LS, but not LV lateral wall LS, correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=0.56, P<0.01; r=0.32, P<0.01) and LV eccentricity index (r=0.57, P<0.01; r=0.57, P<0.01). IVS and LV lateral wall circumferential strain (CS) were both reduced in the pulmonary hypertension group. Although IVS CS and LV lateral wall CS correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure and LV eccentricity index, after adjustment of CS for LV eccentricity index, differences between groups persisted for IVS CS (P<0.01) but not LV lateral wall CS (P=0.09). LV torsion was decreased in patients with pulmonary hypertension compared with control subjects (9.6+/-4.9 degrees versus 14.7+/-4.9 degrees , P<0.001). LV torsion inversely correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=-0.39, P<0.01) and LV eccentricity index (r=-0.3, P<0.01). LV untwisting rates were similar in both groups (P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic RV pressure overload directly affects RV longitudinal systolic deformation. RV pressure overload further influences IVS and LV geometry, which impairs LV torsion and segmental LS and CS, more for the IVS than for the free wall of the LV.
BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that right ventricular (RV) pressure overload affects RV function and further influences left ventricular (LV) geometry, which adversely affects LV twist mechanics and segmental function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic images were prospectively acquired in 44 patients (age, 46+/-12 years; 82% women) with evidence of pulmonary hypertension (estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure, 71+/-23 mm Hg) and in 44 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. Patients with intrinsic LV diseases were excluded. RV lateral wall longitudinal strain (LS) and interventricular septal (IVS) LS were reduced in the pulmonary hypertension group compared with control subjects (-15.9+/-7.6% versus -25.5+/-6.1%, P<0.001; and -17.3+/-4.4% versus -20.2+/-3.9%, P=0.002, respectively), whereas LV lateral wall LS was preserved. RV lateral wall LS and IVS LS, but not LV lateral wall LS, correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=0.56, P<0.01; r=0.32, P<0.01) and LV eccentricity index (r=0.57, P<0.01; r=0.57, P<0.01). IVS and LV lateral wall circumferential strain (CS) were both reduced in the pulmonary hypertension group. Although IVS CS and LV lateral wall CS correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure and LV eccentricity index, after adjustment of CS for LV eccentricity index, differences between groups persisted for IVS CS (P<0.01) but not LV lateral wall CS (P=0.09). LV torsion was decreased in patients with pulmonary hypertension compared with control subjects (9.6+/-4.9 degrees versus 14.7+/-4.9 degrees , P<0.001). LV torsion inversely correlated with pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r=-0.39, P<0.01) and LV eccentricity index (r=-0.3, P<0.01). LV untwisting rates were similar in both groups (P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic RV pressure overload directly affects RV longitudinal systolic deformation. RV pressure overload further influences IVS and LV geometry, which impairs LV torsion and segmental LS and CS, more for the IVS than for the free wall of the LV.
Authors: M R Moon; A F Bolger; A DeAnda; M Komeda; G T Daughters; S D Nikolic; D C Miller; N B Ingels Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-03-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P J Currie; J B Seward; K L Chan; D A Fyfe; D J Hagler; D D Mair; G S Reeder; R A Nishimura; A J Tajik Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Thomas Helle-Valle; Jonas Crosby; Thor Edvardsen; Erik Lyseggen; Brage H Amundsen; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Boaz D Rosen; João A C Lima; Hans Torp; Halfdan Ihlen; Otto A Smiseth Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ronald J Raymond; Alan L Hinderliter; Park W Willis; David Ralph; Edgar J Caldwell; William Williams; Neil A Ettinger; Nicholas S Hill; Warren R Summer; Bennett de Boisblanc; Todd Schwartz; Gary Koch; Linda M Clayton; Maria M Jöbsis; James W Crow; Walker Long Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabriela Querejeta Roca; Patricia Campbell; Brian Claggett; Ali Vazir; Debbie Quinn; Scott D Solomon; Amil M Shah Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Kimberly Kallianos; Gabriel C Brooks; Kanae Mukai; Florent Seguro de Carvalho; Jing Liu; David M Naeger; Teresa De Marco; Karen G Ordovas Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.173