Literature DB >> 20047130

Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Drahomir Aujesky1, Lucia Mazzolai, Olivier Hugli, Arnaud Perrier.   

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is traditionally treated in hospital. Growing evidence from non randomized prospective studies suggests that a substantial proportion of patients with non-massive PE might be safely treated in the outpatient setting using low molecular weight heparins. Based on this evidence, professional societies started to recommend outpatient care for selected patients with non-massive PE. Despite these recommendations, outpatient treatment of non-massive PE appears to be uncommon in clinical practice. The major barriers to PE outpatient care are, firstly, the uncertainty as how to identify low risk patients with PE who are candidates for outpatient care and secondly the lack of high quality evidence from randomized trials demonstrating the safety of PE outpatient care compared to traditional inpatient management. Also, although clinical prognostic models, echocardiography and cardiac biomarkers accurately identify low risk patients with PE in prospective studies, the benefit of risk stratification strategies based on these instruments should be demonstrated in prospective management studies and clinical trials before they can be implemented as decision aids to guide PE outpatient treatment. Before high quality evidence documenting the safety of an outpatient treatment approach is published, outpatient management of non-massive PE cannot be generally recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20047130     DOI: smw-12661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  8 in total

1.  The value of sPESI for risk stratification in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Phil Wells; W Frank Peacock; Gregory J Fermann; Craig I Coleman; Li Wang; Onur Baser; Jeff Schein; Concetta Crivera
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay among Patients with Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Li Wang; Onur Baser; Phil Wells; W Frank Peacock; Craig I Coleman; Gregory J Fermann; Jeff Schein; Concetta Crivera
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-04-08

3.  Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Craig I Coleman; Phil Wells; Gregory J Fermann; Li Wang; Onur Baser; Jeff Schein; Concetta Crivera
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-10-02

4.  Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Srinivas R Banala; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung; Terry W Rice; Cielito C Reyes-Gibby; Carol C Wu; Knox H Todd; W Frank Peacock; Kumar Alagappan
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-06

Review 5.  Reducing the hospital burden associated with the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Adam J Singer
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Safety, efficacy, length of stay and patient satisfaction with outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism patients - a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaqib H Malik; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 7.  New prospective for the management of low-risk pulmonary embolism: prognostic assessment, early discharge, and single-drug therapy with new oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-17

8.  Benefit of early discharge among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Li Wang; Onur Baser; Phil Wells; W Frank Peacock; Craig I Coleman; Gregory J Fermann; Jeff Schein; Concetta Crivera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.