OBJECTIVES: Among potential environmental risk factors for systemic sclerosis (SSc), occupational exposures have received some attention. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between SSc and occupational exposure to silica. METHODS: We searched Medline, Toxline, BIOSIS, and Embase (1949 and November 2009) for original articles published in any language. Sixteen studies are included in the analysis, of which, 3 are cohort studies, 9 case-control and 4 are of other designs. The combined estimator of relative risk (CERR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed or random effect models. RESULTS: Significant heterogeneity was detected (I (2) = 97.2%; P < 0.01), and the CERR was 3.20 (95% CI, 1.89-5.43). The CERR for studies in females was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.74-1.44) and was 3.02 (95% CI, 1.24-7.35) for males. The CERR for case-control studies was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.65-3.31) and was 15.49 (95% CI, 4.54-52.87) for cohort studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that silica exposure may be a significant risk factor for developing SSc and specifically in males. Further observational studies examining the role of occupational silica exposure in the context of other risk factors are needed.
OBJECTIVES: Among potential environmental risk factors for systemic sclerosis (SSc), occupational exposures have received some attention. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between SSc and occupational exposure to silica. METHODS: We searched Medline, Toxline, BIOSIS, and Embase (1949 and November 2009) for original articles published in any language. Sixteen studies are included in the analysis, of which, 3 are cohort studies, 9 case-control and 4 are of other designs. The combined estimator of relative risk (CERR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed or random effect models. RESULTS: Significant heterogeneity was detected (I (2) = 97.2%; P < 0.01), and the CERR was 3.20 (95% CI, 1.89-5.43). The CERR for studies in females was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.74-1.44) and was 3.02 (95% CI, 1.24-7.35) for males. The CERR for case-control studies was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.65-3.31) and was 15.49 (95% CI, 4.54-52.87) for cohort studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that silica exposure may be a significant risk factor for developing SSc and specifically in males. Further observational studies examining the role of occupational silica exposure in the context of other risk factors are needed.
Authors: Don Robinson; Debra Eisenberg; Paul J Nietert; Mittie Doyle; Mohan Bala; Clark Paramore; Kathy Fraeman; Kevin Renahan Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Frederick W Miller; Lars Alfredsson; Karen H Costenbader; Diane L Kamen; Lorene M Nelson; Jill M Norris; Anneclaire J De Roos Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 7.094
Authors: Lisbeth A Aguila; Henrique Carriço da Silva; Ana Cristina Medeiros-Ribeiro; Bruna Giusto Bunjes; Ana Paula Luppino-Assad; Percival D Sampaio-Barros Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2020-08-30 Impact factor: 2.631