Literature DB >> 20046995

Validating CHARMM parameters and exploring charge distribution rules in structure-based drug design.

Jennifer L Knight1, Charles L Brooks.   

Abstract

Using an extensive series of TIBO compounds that are non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, we have systematically evaluated the quality of recently developed ligand parameters that are consistent with the CHARMM22 force field. Thermodynamic integration simulations for 44 pairs of TIBO compounds achieve a high level of success with an overall average unsigned error (AUE) in the relative binding affinities of 1.3 kcal/mol; however, the accuracy is strongly dependent on the size differential between the substituents sampled as well as the class of functional group. Low errors are observed among the alkyl, allyl, aldehyde, nitrile, trifluorinated methyl, and halide TIBO derivatives and large systematic errors among thioether derivatives. We have also investigated how different charge assignment schemes for small molecules impact the quality of computed binding affinities for a subset of this series. This study demonstrates the advantage of using model compounds to derive physically meaningful charge distributions and bond-charge increments for rapidly expanding fragment libraries for drug development applications. Specifically, in the absence of a bond-charge increment for a given pair of atom types, the strategy of adopting CHELPG charges from localized regions of model compounds provides reliable results when modeling with the CHARMM force field.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046995      PMCID: PMC2719862          DOI: 10.1021/ct900079t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  29 in total

Review 1.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

2.  Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges.

Authors:  Marina Udier-Blagović; Patricia Morales De Tirado; Shoshannah A Pearlman; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Alexander W Schüttelkopf; Daan M F van Aalten
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-07-21

Review 5.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 8.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

10.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA.

Authors:  J Wang; P Morin; W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.547

2.  The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building.

Authors:  François-Yves Dupradeau; Adrien Pigache; Thomas Zaffran; Corentin Savineau; Rodolphe Lelong; Nicolas Grivel; Dimitri Lelong; Wilfried Rosanski; Piotr Cieplak
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  FreeSolv: a database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies, with input files.

Authors:  David L Mobley; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Multi-Site λ-dynamics for simulated Structure-Activity Relationship studies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Knight; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  R.E.D. Server: a web service for deriving RESP and ESP charges and building force field libraries for new molecules and molecular fragments.

Authors:  Enguerran Vanquelef; Sabrina Simon; Gaelle Marquant; Elodie Garcia; Geoffroy Klimerak; Jean Charles Delepine; Piotr Cieplak; François-Yves Dupradeau
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Fragment-based docking: development of the CHARMMing Web user interface as a platform for computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  Yuri Pevzner; Emilie Frugier; Vinushka Schalk; Amedeo Caflisch; H Lee Woodcock
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.956

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.